Skip to content

DFAC vs LCDS

Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

DFACANYSE Arca

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDSBNasdaq

Overlap

40.8%by weight

Expense ratio

DFAC −0.13pt a year

DFAC0.17%LCDS0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAC 3136.4×the volume

DFAC2MLCDS639

DFAC vs LCDS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+16.1%DFAC+13.1%LCDS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DFAC +16.1%. LCDS +13.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFAC 0.17%, better
LCDS 0.30%
Fund size
DFAC $87.7B
LCDS $16M
1Y total return
DFAC +16.1%, better
LCDS +13.1%
Yield (12M)
DFAC 0.88%, better
LCDS 0.86%
Holdings
DFAC 2553
LCDS 113
Avg volume (30D)
DFAC 2M sh, better
LCDS 639 sh
NAV per share
DFAC $44.87
LCDS $73.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAC: Cost 94, Risk 66, Mission 100, Tradability 87, Holdings 87, Durability 97. LCDS: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission 81, Tradability 9, Holdings 63, Durability 40.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAC, LCDS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFACLCDS
Cost30% weightA94HigherA83
Mission25% weightA100HigherA81
Risk15% weightB66HigherB60
Tradability15% weightA87HigherF9
Holdings10% weightA87HigherB63
Durability5% weightA97HigherC40

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAC and LCDS are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAC ranks 3rd and LCDS 48th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 4ADYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETFScore 83
  5. Rank 48BBROLBaron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 48BLCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 48BPFDEPathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFACADimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

LCDSBJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

In short

DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.

LCDS J.P. Morgan aims its human stock analysts at a data-science engine and builds a roughly 110-stock alternative to the S&P 500 from what comes out. Active large-cap core, priced at 0.30%, well under the usual active tab.

Stated mandate

DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.

LCDS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of large, established companies. Its approach combines fundamental research, data insights, and risk management to assess financial prospects and relative valuation.

Why people hold it

  • DFAC 0.17% a year for an actively run fund, well under the median fee among active US equity ETFs.
  • About 2,600 US stocks under one ticker, so it holds the market broadly rather than a narrow slice of it.
  • Federal income-tax implications sit inside the stated objective, not in a footnote, so they factor into what managers buy and sell.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund with a track record running back to 2007 and one of the strongest implementations in its peer group.
  • LCDS 0.30% a year, under half the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and cheaper than most active funds run against the S&P 500 (HELO 0.50%, JPEF 0.44%, TSPA 0.34%).
  • Roughly 110 stocks instead of 500: concentrated enough for analyst picks to register, still recognizably large-cap core.
  • The method is spelled out in the fund's own documents: fundamental research, data insights and risk management applied to large, established companies.jpmorgan.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of the active US equity funds we cover, helped by a cost structure closer to index products than to stockpickers.

Worth knowing

  • DFAC Actively managed, so there's no published index to check it against. Holdings and tilts shift at the managers' discretion.
  • Dimensional's own DFAU runs a US core equity mandate for 0.12%, a slightly lighter fee for a similar shelf.
  • All stocks, all US: the mandate is capital appreciation from equities, so it takes the market's full swings, and cash arrives quarterly.
  • LCDS Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads tend to be wider than at the giant index funds it competes with.
  • Launched in August 2024, so there is not yet a long record covering different market environments.
  • The mandate is long-term capital appreciation, not income; distributions arrive quarterly.

Full DFAC profile⁠

Full LCDS profile⁠

DFAC vs LCDS Holdings

How DFAC and LCDS differ

Overlap by weight

40.8%

Shared holdings make up 96.6% of LCDS and 42.0% of DFAC.

Level by level

  • Holdings104 in both40.8%
  • Countryby domicile98.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for LCDS.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFAC and LCDS, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFACMore in LCDS
United StatesLCDS +0.6 points
Other countries (14)DFAC +0.6 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFAC26.4%
  • LCDS42.4%

Securities held

  • DFAC2,550
  • LCDS111

Asset class

DFAC
Equity
LCDS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DFAC2,446
  • In both104
  • Only in LCDS7

Only in DFAC

2,446 securities, 57.6% of DFAC by weight

  • JPMorgan Chase & Co Common Stock USD1.01.13%
  • Alphabet Inc Class C Common Stock USD.0010.91%
  • Visa Inc Class A Shares Common Stock USD.00010.79%

Only in LCDS

7 securities, 3.4% of LCDS by weight

  • Trane Technologies PLC0.69%
  • Digital Realty Trust Inc0.54%
  • Prologis Inc Reit USD0.53%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 104 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in DFAC and LCDS, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DFACMore in LCDS
NVIDIA Corp Common Stock USD.001NVDALCDS +2.88 points
Alphabet Inc Class A Common Stock USD.001GOOGLLCDS +2.87 points
Apple Inc Common Stock USD.00001AAPLLCDS +1.97 points
Microsoft Corp Common Stock USD.00000625MSFTLCDS +1.95 points
Wells Fargo & Co Common Stock USD1.666WFCLCDS +1.78 points
Amazon.com Inc Common Stock USD.01AMZNLCDS +1.65 points
Exxonmobil Holdings Corp Common StockXOMLCDS +1.24 points
Philip Morris International Common StockPMLCDS +1.23 points

All 2,598 DFAC holdings⁠All 111 LCDS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAC vs LCDS Cost

Overpaying LCDS vs DFAC

$2,603

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAC 0.17%

    $3,546

  • LCDS 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAC 0.17%
  • LCDS 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LCDS $6,149DFAC $3,546

Year by year

YearDFACLCDSOverpaying
10$310$545$235
20$1,211$2,113$902
30$3,546$6,149$2,603

Expense ratio

  • 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
  • 0.30%LCDS
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds

LCDS 21st cheapest of 121 funds

DFAC vs LCDS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAC 0.88%, better
LCDS 0.86%
Payout (12M)
DFAC $0.39
LCDS $0.63
Last payment
DFAC $0.10
LCDS $0.17
Ex-dividend
DFAC Sep 22, 2026
LCDS Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
DFAC Sep 24, 2026
LCDS Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
DFAC Quarterly
LCDS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

DFACQuarterly · 22 paymentsAll DFAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 22 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Jun 22, 2021 $0.06; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.11; Mar 22, 2022 $0.06; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.09; Dec 20, 2022 $0.12; Mar 21, 2023 $0.06; Jun 21, 2023 $0.09; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.10; Mar 19, 2024 $0.07; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.09; Dec 17, 2024 $0.10; Mar 25, 2025 $0.08; Jun 24, 2025 $0.11; Sep 23, 2025 $0.11; Dec 16, 2025 $0.09; Mar 24, 2026 $0.10; Jun 23, 2026 $0.11; Sep 22, 2026 $0.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD
LCDSQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll LCDS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2024 $0.07; Dec 24, 2024 $0.19; Mar 25, 2025 $0.10; Jun 24, 2025 $0.14; Sep 23, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.20; Mar 24, 2026 $0.13; Jun 23, 2026 $0.13; Sep 22, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.2020232026YTD

DFAC vs LCDS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAC 12.6%LCDS 11.9%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAC 1.32LCDS 0.95since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAC −23.1%LCDS −18.4%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAC 0.99LCDS 0.94

DFAC and LCDS in the news

Popular comparisons

  • DFACAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsAVLCA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFACAvsDFAUA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsDFAUA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.12%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFACAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsDYNFA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.