Skip to content

DFAU vs LCDS

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

DFAUANYSE Arca

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

LCDSBNasdaq

Overlap

51.7%by weight

Expense ratio

DFAU −0.18pt a year

DFAU0.12%LCDS0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

DFAU 868.2×the volume

DFAU555KLCDS639

DFAU vs LCDS Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+13.2%DFAU+13.1%LCDS

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. DFAU +13.2%. LCDS +13.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
DFAU 0.12%, better
LCDS 0.30%
Fund size
DFAU $12.9B
LCDS $16M
1Y total return
DFAU +13.2%, better
LCDS +13.1%
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.90%, better
LCDS 0.86%
Holdings
DFAU 2165
LCDS 113
Avg volume (30D)
DFAU 555K sh, better
LCDS 639 sh
NAV per share
DFAU $52.28
LCDS $73.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

DFAU: Cost 97, Risk 65, Mission 83, Tradability 87, Holdings 84, Durability 91. LCDS: Cost 83, Risk 60, Mission 81, Tradability 9, Holdings 63, Durability 40.
Pillar letters and Scores for DFAU, LCDS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarDFAULCDS
Cost30% weightA97HigherA83
Mission25% weightA83HigherA81
Risk15% weightB65HigherB60
Tradability15% weightA87HigherF9
Holdings10% weightA84HigherB63
Durability5% weightA91HigherC40

Rank among US Active Equity funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. DFAU and LCDS are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Equity⁠

Category · 121 funds
See all 121 ›

DFAU ranks 2nd and LCDS 48th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVLCAvantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2ADFAUDimensional US Core Equity Market ETFScore 86
  3. Rank 3ADFACDimensional US Core Equity 2 ETFScore 85
  4. Rank 48BBROLBaron Risk Optimized Large Cap ETFScore 58
  5. Rank 48BLCDSJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETFScore 58
  6. Rank 48BPFDEPathfinder Disciplined US Equity ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

DFAUADimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

LCDSBJPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF

In short

DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.

LCDS J.P. Morgan aims its human stock analysts at a data-science engine and builds a roughly 110-stock alternative to the S&P 500 from what comes out. Active large-cap core, priced at 0.30%, well under the usual active tab.

Stated mandate

DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.

LCDS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of large, established companies. Its approach combines fundamental research, data insights, and risk management to assess financial prospects and relative valuation.

Why people hold it

  • DFAU Charges 0.12% a year, well under the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and the cheapest of the top-graded names in its group (AVLC, DFAC, FELC).
  • Holds roughly 2,400 US companies, so no single name steers the fund. Whole-market coverage, not a concentrated bet.
  • Active without the stock-picking drama: it leans weights toward value, profitability and momentum, using the Russell 3000 as its reference point rather than a rigid rulebook.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, and one of the strongest overall implementations in its active US equity peer group.
  • LCDS 0.30% a year, under half the 0.65% median for active US equity funds and cheaper than most active funds run against the S&P 500 (HELO 0.50%, JPEF 0.44%, TSPA 0.34%).
  • Roughly 110 stocks instead of 500: concentrated enough for analyst picks to register, still recognizably large-cap core.
  • The method is spelled out in the fund's own documents: fundamental research, data insights and risk management applied to large, established companies.jpmorgan.com
  • Sits in the upper tier of the active US equity funds we cover, helped by a cost structure closer to index products than to stockpickers.

Worth knowing

  • DFAU Those tilts cut both ways: results can drift from a plain Russell 3000 fund for long stretches, in either direction.
  • No published index behind it. The trade-off for flexibility is that you're buying Dimensional's process, not a public set of rules you can check line by line.
  • Distributions land quarterly, not monthly, and the mandate is long-term capital appreciation rather than income.
  • LCDS Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads tend to be wider than at the giant index funds it competes with.
  • Launched in August 2024, so there is not yet a long record covering different market environments.
  • The mandate is long-term capital appreciation, not income; distributions arrive quarterly.

Full DFAU profile⁠

Full LCDS profile⁠

DFAU vs LCDS Holdings

How DFAU and LCDS differ

Overlap by weight

51.7%

Shared holdings make up 96.5% of LCDS and 54.0% of DFAU.

Level by level

  • Holdings103 in both51.7%
  • Countryby domicile99.3%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for LCDS.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in DFAU and LCDS, widest gap first
CountryMore in DFAUMore in LCDS
United StatesLCDS +0.2 points
NetherlandsLCDS +0.5 points
SwitzerlandDFAU +0.3 points
ChinaDFAU +0.1 points
United KingdomDFAU +0.1 points
MexicoDFAU +0.1 points
IrelandSame weight
BrazilSame weight
Other countries (4)DFAU +0.1 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • DFAU33.4%
  • LCDS42.4%

Securities held

  • DFAU2,164
  • LCDS111

Asset class

DFAU
Equity
LCDS
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in DFAU2,061
  • In both103
  • Only in LCDS8

Only in DFAU

2,061 securities, 45.9% of DFAU by weight

  • Alphabet Inc1.76%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co1.21%
  • Visa Inc0.96%

Only in LCDS

8 securities, 3.5% of LCDS by weight

  • Trane Technologies PLC0.69%
  • Digital Realty Trust Inc0.54%
  • Prologis Inc Reit USD0.53%

Weight gaps

The 100 widest of 103 Holdings in both funds.

Holding weights in DFAU and LCDS, widest gap first
HoldingMore in DFAUMore in LCDS
Alphabet Inc - Class AGOOGLLCDS +2.08 points
Wells Fargo & Co.WFCLCDS +1.77 points
NVIDIA CorpNVDALCDS +1.51 points
Mastercard Inc - AMALCDS +1.20 points
Microsoft CorpMSFTLCDS +1.12 points
Csx CorpCSXLCDS +1.11 points
Exxonmobil Holdings CorpXOMLCDS +1.10 points
AbbVie Inc.ABBVLCDS +1.05 points

All 2,381 DFAU holdings⁠All 111 LCDS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

DFAU vs LCDS Cost

Overpaying LCDS vs DFAU

$3,629

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • DFAU 0.12%

    $2,520

  • LCDS 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • DFAU 0.12%
  • LCDS 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530LCDS $6,149DFAU $2,520

Year by year

YearDFAULCDSOverpaying
10$220$545$325
20$859$2,113$1,254
30$2,520$6,149$3,629

Expense ratio

  • 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
  • 0.30%LCDS
  • Middle half of US Active Equity funds
  • Median 0.68%

DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds

LCDS 21st cheapest of 121 funds

DFAU vs LCDS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
DFAU 0.90%, better
LCDS 0.86%
Payout (12M)
DFAU $0.47
LCDS $0.63
Last payment
DFAU $0.12
LCDS $0.17
Ex-dividend
DFAU Sep 22, 2026
LCDS Sep 22, 2026
Paid on
DFAU Sep 24, 2026
LCDS Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
DFAU Quarterly
LCDS Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2020 to 2026, same scale for both

DFAUQuarterly · 24 paymentsAll DFAU payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2020 $0.03; Mar 23, 2021 $0.05; Jun 22, 2021 $0.08; Sep 21, 2021 $0.08; Dec 16, 2021 $0.12; Mar 22, 2022 $0.07; Jun 22, 2022 $0.09; Sep 20, 2022 $0.10; Dec 20, 2022 $0.11; Mar 21, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2023 $0.10; Sep 19, 2023 $0.10; Dec 19, 2023 $0.13; Mar 19, 2024 $0.08; Jun 18, 2024 $0.10; Sep 17, 2024 $0.11; Dec 17, 2024 $0.16; Mar 25, 2025 $0.09; Jun 24, 2025 $0.12; Sep 23, 2025 $0.12; Dec 16, 2025 $0.12; Mar 24, 2026 $0.11; Jun 23, 2026 $0.12; Sep 22, 2026 $0.12. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD
LCDSQuarterly · 9 paymentsAll LCDS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2020 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2024 $0.07; Dec 24, 2024 $0.19; Mar 25, 2025 $0.10; Jun 24, 2025 $0.14; Sep 23, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.20; Mar 24, 2026 $0.13; Jun 23, 2026 $0.13; Sep 22, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.20202020232026YTD

DFAU vs LCDS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
DFAU 12.4%LCDS 11.9%since Sep 2024
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
DFAU 1.38LCDS 0.95since Sep 2024
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
DFAU −23.6%LCDS −18.4%since Aug 2024
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
DFAU 1.01LCDS 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • DFAUAvsAVLCA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsAVLCA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDFACA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsDFACA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • DFAUAvsDYNFA

    Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.12% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LCDSBvsDYNFA

    JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF · iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.