VCRM ranks 4th and AVMU 19th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
AVMU vs VCRM
VCRM −0.03pt a year
0.15%0.12%
VCRM 25.2×the volume
26.9K679K
AVMU vs VCRM Performance
0.0%+1.1%
- AVMU 0.15%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- AVMU $172M
- VCRM $2.2B
- AVMU 0.0%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- AVMU 3.59%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- AVMU 575
- VCRM 2588
- AVMU 26.9K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- AVMU $44.60
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVMU | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B66 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B59 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. AVMU and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVMUB
VCRMA
In short
AVMU Active muni management at index-fund pricing. Avantis runs a broad investment-grade portfolio of roughly 500 municipal bonds for 0.15%, half the typical fee in its category, aimed at income exempt from federal tax.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
AVMU The fund seeks income exempt from federal income tax by investing broadly in investment-grade municipal debt. It uses active portfolio oversight and current-yield information while pursuing diversification and controlled turnover.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVMU vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVMU vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying AVMU vs VCRM
$617
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVMU 0.15%
$3,137
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVMU | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $220 | $54 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $859 | $212 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $2,520 | $617 |
- 0.15%AVMU
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
AVMU 9th cheapest of 63 funds
AVMU vs VCRM Dividends
- AVMU 3.59%
- VCRM 3.81%, better
- AVMU $1.60
- VCRM $2.82
- AVMU $0.14
- VCRM $0.21
- AVMU Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- AVMU Oct 8, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- AVMU Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
AVMU vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVMU 6.6%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVMU −0.03VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- AVMU −11.8%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AVMU 0.93VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.