AVXC ranks 3rd and MEM 25th of 27 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Equity Category.
AVXC vs MEM
AVXC −0.46pt a year
0.33%0.79%
AVXC 11.5×the volume
42.9K3.73K
AVXC vs MEM Performance
+22.4%+5.1%
- AVXC 0.33%, better
- MEM 0.79%
- AVXC $427M
- MEM $50M
- AVXC +22.4%, better
- MEM +5.1%
- AVXC 2.39%
- MEM 3.36%, better
- AVXC 2922
- MEM 68
- AVXC 42.9K sh, better
- MEM 3.73K sh
- AVXC $74.83
- MEM $38.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVXC | MEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F15 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A85Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D29 |
| Durability | B68Higher | C54 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVXC and MEM are both graded against the same 27 Emerging Markets Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVXCA
MEMD
In short
AVXC The China question, answered by subtraction. Avantis runs its usual emerging-markets playbook (roughly 2,800 stocks of every size, tilted toward the cheap and the profitable) with China left out entirely, for 0.33% a year.
MEM An Asia specialist's take on the whole emerging world. Matthews runs MEM as a concentrated active book of roughly 40 names, with the prospectus objective pointing primarily at the Asia Pacific region.
Stated mandate
AVXC The fund invests in a broad set of companies across emerging-market countries, excluding China, and spanning all market capitalizations. It seeks higher expected returns by overweighting securities with lower valuations and higher profitability ratios.
MEM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests primarily in the Asia Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVXC vs MEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVXC vs MEM Cost
Overpaying MEM vs AVXC
$8,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVXC 0.33%
$6,737
MEM 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVXC | MEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,405 | $807 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $5,331 | $3,013 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $15,174 | $8,437 |
- 0.33%AVXC, cheaper
- 0.79%MEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
- Median 0.65%
AVXC cheapest of 27 funds
MEM 22nd cheapest of 27 funds
AVXC vs MEM Dividends
- AVXC 2.39%
- MEM 3.36%, better
- AVXC $1.79
- MEM $1.27
- AVXC $0.45
- MEM $1.27
- AVXC Sep 8, 2026
- MEM Dec 17, 2025
- AVXC Sep 10, 2026
- MEM Dec 22, 2025
- AVXC Quarterly
- MEM Annual
Distribution history
AVXC vs MEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVXC 19.2%MEM 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVXC 0.76MEM 0.83
- Worst fall
- AVXC −20.4%MEM −19.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AVXC 0.93MEM 1.19
AVXC and MEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

