JEMA ranks 2nd and MEM 25th of 27 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Equity Category.
JEMA vs MEM
JEMA −0.46pt a year
0.33%0.79%
JEMA 39.6×the volume
147K3.73K
JEMA +2.8pt
+22.3%+19.5%
JEMA vs MEM Performance
+16.5%+5.1%
- JEMA 0.33%, better
- MEM 0.79%
- JEMA $1.59B
- MEM $50M
- JEMA +16.5%, better
- MEM +5.1%
- JEMA 2.55%
- MEM 3.36%, better
- JEMA 486
- MEM 68
- JEMA 147K sh, better
- MEM 3.73K sh
- JEMA $56.18
- MEM $38.82
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JEMA | MEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | F15 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B58Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A82Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | D29 | |
| Durability | A89Higher | C54 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
Same Category. JEMA and MEM are both graded against the same 27 Emerging Markets Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JEMAA
MEMD
In short
JEMA Active emerging-markets management priced like an index fund: J.P. Morgan blends its own country, region and style EM strategies into one roughly 500-stock portfolio built to keep the MSCI EM index's sector and country risk shape.
MEM An Asia specialist's take on the whole emerging world. Matthews runs MEM as a concentrated active book of roughly 40 names, with the prospectus objective pointing primarily at the Asia Pacific region.
Stated mandate
JEMA Seeks long-term capital appreciation through a portfolio of emerging-market equities.
MEM The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests primarily in the Asia Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JEMA vs MEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JEMA vs MEM Cost
Overpaying MEM vs JEMA
$8,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JEMA 0.33%
$6,737
MEM 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JEMA | MEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $1,405 | $807 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $5,331 | $3,013 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $15,174 | $8,437 |
- 0.33%JEMA, cheaper
- 0.79%MEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Equity funds
- Median 0.65%
JEMA cheapest of 27 funds
MEM 22nd cheapest of 27 funds
JEMA vs MEM Dividends
- JEMA 2.55%
- MEM 3.36%, better
- JEMA $1.43
- MEM $1.27
- JEMA $1.43
- MEM $1.27
- JEMA Dec 16, 2025
- MEM Dec 17, 2025
- JEMA Dec 18, 2025
- MEM Dec 22, 2025
- JEMA Annual
- MEM Annual
Distribution history
JEMA vs MEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JEMA 16.7%, betterMEM 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- JEMA 1.03, betterMEM 0.83
- Worst fall
- JEMA −36.5%MEM −19.8%
- Market sensitivity
- JEMA 1.05MEM 1.19
JEMA and MEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




