BABX ranks 78th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABX vs GOGL
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.89pt a year
1.09%0.20%
BABX 43.4×the volume
821K18.9K
BABX vs GOGL Performance
−35.0%−42.4%
- BABX 1.09%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- BABX $91M
- GOGL $4M
- BABX −71.7%
- GOGL
- BABX 2
- GOGL 1
- BABX 821K sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- BABX $13.27
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABX | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | D34 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | D36 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABX and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABXC
GOGLC
In short
BABX The original 2x Alibaba ETF: live since 2022, years before its rivals. It aims for twice BABA's daily move, resets every night, and costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
Stated mandate
BABX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s common stock. It is intended as a short-term leveraged trading vehicle rather than a long-term investment.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABX vs GOGL Holdings
How BABX and GOGL differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BABX and 0.0% of GOGL.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- BABX100.0%
- GOGL199.3%
- BABX1
- GOGL0
Asset class
- BABX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
Holdings
- Only in BABX1
- In both0
- Only in GOGL0
Only in BABX
1 security, 66.7% of BABX by weight
- Baba66.65%
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Weight gaps
BABX and GOGL share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABX vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying BABX vs GOGL
$15,978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABX 1.09%
$20,133
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABX | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $365 | $1,550 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $1,421 | $5,745 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $4,155 | $15,978 |
- 1.09%BABX
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
BABX 219th cheapest of 315 funds
BABX vs GOGL Dividends
- BABX None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
BABX vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABX 95.3%GOGL
- Return per unit of risk
- BABX 0.25GOGL
- Worst fall
- BABX −79.2%GOGL
- Market sensitivity
- BABX 1.02GOGL −3.37
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.