PANG ranks 3rd and BABX 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABX vs PANG
PANG −0.33pt a year
1.09%0.76%
BABX 18.4×the volume
821K44.6K
BABX vs PANG Performance
−71.7%+76.3%
- BABX 1.09%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- BABX $91M
- PANG $9M
- BABX −71.7%
- PANG +76.3%, better
- BABX 2
- PANG 4
- BABX 821K sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- BABX $13.27
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A94 |
| Risk | D34 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABXC
PANGA
In short
BABX The original 2x Alibaba ETF: live since 2022, years before its rivals. It aims for twice BABA's daily move, resets every night, and costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
BABX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s common stock. It is intended as a short-term leveraged trading vehicle rather than a long-term investment.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABX vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying BABX vs PANG
$5,477
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABX 1.09%
$20,133
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,353 | $562 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $5,142 | $2,024 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $14,656 | $5,477 |
- 1.09%BABX
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BABX 219th cheapest of 315 funds
BABX vs PANG Dividends
- BABX None
- PANG
- BABX
- PANG $1.30
- BABX
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- BABX
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- BABX
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
BABX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABX 95.3%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BABX 0.25PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BABX −79.2%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BABX 1.02PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.