UNHG ranks 2nd and BABX 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABX vs UNHG
UNHG −0.32pt a year
1.09%0.77%
BABX 1.1×the volume
821K726K
BABX vs UNHG Performance
−71.7%+8.4%
- BABX 1.09%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- BABX $91M
- UNHG $63M
- BABX −71.7%
- UNHG +8.4%, better
- BABX 2
- UNHG 5
- BABX 821K sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- BABX $13.27
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABX | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A90 |
| Risk | D34 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A89 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABX and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABXC
UNHGA
In short
BABX The original 2x Alibaba ETF: live since 2022, years before its rivals. It aims for twice BABA's daily move, resets every night, and costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
BABX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s common stock. It is intended as a short-term leveraged trading vehicle rather than a long-term investment.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABX vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABX vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying BABX vs UNHG
$5,304
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABX 1.09%
$20,133
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABX | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,371 | $544 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $5,205 | $1,961 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $14,829 | $5,304 |
- 1.09%BABX
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
BABX 219th cheapest of 315 funds
BABX vs UNHG Dividends
- BABX None
- UNHG
- BABX
- UNHG $1.90
- BABX
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- BABX
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- BABX
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
BABX vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABX 95.3%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BABX 0.25UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- BABX −79.2%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BABX 1.02UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.