TSMG ranks 1st and BABX 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BABX vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.33pt a year
1.09%0.76%
BABX 11.9×the volume
821K69K
BABX vs TSMG Performance
−71.7%+36.4%
- BABX 1.09%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- BABX $91M
- TSMG $28M
- BABX −71.7%
- TSMG +36.4%, better
- BABX 2
- TSMG 5
- BABX 821K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- BABX $13.27
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BABX | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D39 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A96Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D34 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A82Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BABX and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BABXC
TSMGA
In short
BABX The original 2x Alibaba ETF: live since 2022, years before its rivals. It aims for twice BABA's daily move, resets every night, and costs 1.15% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
BABX The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily percentage change of Alibaba Group Holding Limited’s common stock. It is intended as a short-term leveraged trading vehicle rather than a long-term investment.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BABX vs TSMG Holdings
How BABX and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BABX and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Country0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BABXMore in TSMG | BABX | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | BABX +100.0 points | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| United States | TSMG +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Outside the US: BABX 0% developed, 100% emerging.
Concentration
- BABX100.0%
- TSMG214.6%
- BABX1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- BABX
- Leveraged/Inverse
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BABX1
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in BABX
1 security, 66.7% of BABX by weight
- Baba66.65%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 14.6% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204014.59%
Weight gaps
BABX and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BABX vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying BABX vs TSMG
$5,477
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BABX 1.09%
$20,133
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BABX | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,915 | $1,353 | $562 |
| 20 | $7,166 | $5,142 | $2,024 |
| 30 | $20,133 | $14,656 | $5,477 |
- 1.09%BABX
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
BABX 219th cheapest of 315 funds
BABX vs TSMG Dividends
- BABX None
- TSMG
- BABX
- TSMG $2.73
- BABX
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- BABX
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- BABX
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
BABX vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BABX 95.3%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BABX 0.25TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- BABX −79.2%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BABX 1.02TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.09% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.09% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.