WTV ranks 1st and BAMV 48th of 64 funds in the US Active Value Category.
BAMV vs WTV
WTV −0.74pt a year
0.86%0.12%
WTV 8.8×the volume
19.7K173K
WTV +7.8pt
+15.6%+23.4%
BAMV vs WTV Performance
+16.3%+21.6%
- BAMV 0.86%
- WTV 0.12%, better
- BAMV $123M
- WTV $3.35B
- BAMV +16.3%
- WTV +21.6%, better
- BAMV 1.23%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- BAMV 101
- WTV 126
- BAMV 19.7K sh
- WTV 173K sh, better
- BAMV $35.91
- WTV $105.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAMV | WTV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F9 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A84Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A89Higher |
Rank among US Active Value funds
Same Category. BAMV and WTV are both graded against the same 64 US Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAMVD
WTVA
In short
BAMV A stock-picker's value fund in a category run by quant screens. Brookstone's team hand-builds roughly 80 US names, $2 billion market cap and up, and charges 0.86% with no fee waiver in place.
WTV Most value funds shop for low price tags. WTV shops for cash coming back to shareholders: dividends plus net buybacks, filtered for quality and profitability. Actively run, priced like an index fund at 0.12%.
Stated mandate
BAMV The Fund's stated objective is capital appreciation.
WTV The fund seeks income and capital appreciation through primarily U.S. equities selected for high total shareholder yield and favorable relative quality characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAMV vs WTV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAMV vs WTV Cost
Overpaying BAMV vs WTV
$13,848
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAMV 0.86%
$16,368
WTV 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAMV | WTV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $220 | $1,305 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $859 | $4,909 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $2,520 | $13,848 |
- 0.86%BAMV
- 0.12%WTV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Value funds
- Median 0.55%
WTV cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV 59th cheapest of 64 funds
BAMV vs WTV Dividends
- BAMV 1.23%
- WTV 1.99%, better
- BAMV $0.45
- WTV $2.14
- BAMV $0.11
- WTV $0.55
- BAMV Aug 28, 2026
- WTV Sep 25, 2026
- BAMV Sep 4, 2026
- WTV Sep 29, 2026
- BAMV Quarterly
- WTV Quarterly
Distribution history
BAMV vs WTV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAMV 11.7%, betterWTV 13.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BAMV 1.03WTV 1.33, better
- Worst fall
- BAMV −14.5%WTV −19.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BAMV 0.70WTV 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.