Skip to content

BAPR vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BAPRCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BAPR0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 1.9×the volume

BAPR7.82KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BAPR +1.1pt

BAPR+15.7%SIXJ+14.6%

BAPR vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+15.3%BAPR+10.2%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. BAPR +15.3%. SIXJ +10.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BAPR 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BAPR $414M
SIXJ $148M
1Y total return
BAPR +15.3%, better
SIXJ +10.2%
Holdings
BAPR 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BAPR 7.82K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
BAPR $54.64
SIXJ $37.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAPR: Cost 40, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 60, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAPR, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAPRSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB59B68Higher
Tradability15% weightB60A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightA82HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAPR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and BAPR 33rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 33CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 52
  7. Rank 33CBAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  8. Rank 33CBMARInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAPRCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BAPR Buffered S&P 500 exposure on an April clock. FLEX options absorb the first 9% of a drawdown over each roughly one-year period, and the trade-off is a ceiling on the upside. Live since 2019, resetting every April 1.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BAPR The Fund seeks to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 over the current approximately one-year Outcome Period, subject to a cap, while buffering the first 9% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing the Underlying ETF.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BAPR The first 9% of an S&P 500 decline is absorbed over each roughly one-year outcome period, built from FLEX options on SPY inside a 1940 Act fund rather than a bank note.
  • Clean annual reset: each April 1 starts a new twelve-month period with a fresh 9% buffer and a fresh cap, no rolling or rebalancing on your end.
  • Trading since April 2019, so the April vintage has already run through multiple full outcome periods, including live market stress.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BAPR The upside is capped. In a strong S&P 500 year the fund is designed to stop participating once the period's cap is reached.
  • Buffer and cap are measured from the April 1 start. Buy mid-period and the protection left and the room above you differ from the headline terms.
  • 0.79% a year, above cheaper buffered peers such as SWAN and DMAX. It is also one of the lighter-volume buffer funds and has not been paying distributions.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BAPR profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BAPR vs SIXJ Holdings

How BAPR and SIXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BAPR and 0.0% of SIXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in BAPR and SIXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in BAPRMore in SIXJ
TechnologySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BAPR and SIXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in BAPRMore in SIXJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BAPR104.6%
  • SIXJ100.8%

Securities held

  • BAPR3
  • SIXJ2

Asset class

BAPR
Equity
SIXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BAPR3
  • In both0
  • Only in SIXJ2

Only in BAPR

3 securities, 100% of BAPR by weight

  • Spy 03/31/2027 6.52 C103.20%
  • Spy 03/31/2027 650.35 P1.17%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.27%

Only in SIXJ

2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C98.55%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.96%

Weight gaps

BAPR and SIXJ share no securities.

All 6 BAPR holdings⁠All 5 SIXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAPR vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BAPR vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAPR 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAPR 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAPR $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBAPRSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BAPR
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BAPR 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BAPR vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
BAPR None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

BAPRAll BAPR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BAPR vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAPR 7.9%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAPR 1.44SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAPR −15.6%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAPR 0.64SIXJ 0.46

BAPR and SIXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BAPRCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAPRCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAPRCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.