SIXJ ranks 4th and BAPR 33rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BAPR vs SIXJ
0.0%by weight
SIXJ −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
SIXJ 1.9×the volume
7.82K15.1K
BAPR +1.1pt
+15.7%+14.6%
BAPR vs SIXJ Performance
+15.3%+10.2%
- BAPR 0.79%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- BAPR $414M
- SIXJ $148M
- BAPR +15.3%, better
- SIXJ +10.2%
- BAPR 3
- SIXJ 3
- BAPR 7.82K sh
- SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
- BAPR $54.64
- SIXJ $37.15
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAPR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B59 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B57 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BAPR and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAPRC
SIXJB
In short
BAPR Buffered S&P 500 exposure on an April clock. FLEX options absorb the first 9% of a drawdown over each roughly one-year period, and the trade-off is a ceiling on the upside. Live since 2019, resetting every April 1.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
BAPR The Fund seeks to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 over the current approximately one-year Outcome Period, subject to a cap, while buffering the first 9% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing the Underlying ETF.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAPR vs SIXJ Holdings
How BAPR and SIXJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BAPR and 0.0% of SIXJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in BAPRMore in SIXJ | BAPR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BAPRMore in SIXJ | BAPR | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- BAPR104.6%
- SIXJ100.8%
- BAPR3
- SIXJ2
Asset class
- BAPR
- Equity
- SIXJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in BAPR3
- In both0
- Only in SIXJ2
Only in BAPR
3 securities, 100% of BAPR by weight
- Spy 03/31/2027 6.52 C103.20%
- Spy 03/31/2027 650.35 P1.17%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.27%
Only in SIXJ
2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight
- Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C98.55%
- Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.96%
Weight gaps
BAPR and SIXJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAPR vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying BAPR vs SIXJ
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAPR 0.79%
$15,174
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAPR | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%BAPR
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
BAPR 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BAPR vs SIXJ Dividends
- BAPR None
- SIXJ None
Distribution history
BAPR vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAPR 7.9%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BAPR 1.44SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- BAPR −15.6%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BAPR 0.64SIXJ 0.46
BAPR and SIXJ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
