ZALT ranks 1st and BAPR 33rd of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
BAPR vs ZALT
ZALT −0.10pt a year
0.79%0.69%
ZALT 17.7×the volume
7.82K138K
BAPR +5.7pt
+15.7%+10.0%
BAPR vs ZALT Performance
+15.3%+6.9%
- BAPR 0.79%
- ZALT 0.69%, better
- BAPR $414M
- ZALT $840M
- BAPR +15.3%, better
- ZALT +6.9%
- BAPR 3
- ZALT 503
- BAPR 7.82K sh
- ZALT 138K sh, better
- BAPR $54.64
- ZALT $34.50
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BAPR | ZALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A82Higher |
| Mission | A80 | |
| Risk | B59 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A90 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | B61 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. BAPR and ZALT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BAPRC
ZALTA
In short
BAPR Buffered S&P 500 exposure on an April clock. FLEX options absorb the first 9% of a drawdown over each roughly one-year period, and the trade-off is a ceiling on the upside. Live since 2019, resetting every April 1.
ZALT The defined-outcome trade on a three-month clock: ZALT follows SPY up to a cap and buffers the first 10% of a decline, then resets both every quarter. Four fresh caps a year, at a fee under the shallow-buffer median.
Stated mandate
BAPR The Fund seeks to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the S&P 500 over the current approximately one-year Outcome Period, subject to a cap, while buffering the first 9% of losses. It uses FLEX Options referencing the Underlying ETF.
ZALT The fund seeks to follow SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while providing a 10% downside buffer over each three-month outcome period. It may be held indefinitely, with the defined outcomes resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BAPR vs ZALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BAPR vs ZALT Cost
Overpaying BAPR vs ZALT
$1,745
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BAPR 0.79%
$15,174
ZALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BAPR | ZALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,232 | $173 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $4,697 | $634 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $13,429 | $1,745 |
- 0.79%BAPR
- 0.69%ZALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
ZALT 14th cheapest of 77 funds
BAPR 34th cheapest of 77 funds
BAPR vs ZALT Dividends
- BAPR None
- ZALT None
Distribution history
BAPR vs ZALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BAPR 7.9%ZALT 3.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BAPR 1.44ZALT 1.50, better
- Worst fall
- BAPR −15.6%ZALT −8.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BAPR 0.64ZALT 0.29
BAPR and ZALT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
