Skip to content

BAUG vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BAUGCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BAUG0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BAUG 13.6×the volume

BAUG22.4KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

BAUG +2.0pt

BAUG+10.9%XTR+8.9%

BAUG vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+67.8%BAUG+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BAUG +67.8%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BAUG 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BAUG $267M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BAUG +10.8%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
BAUG No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
BAUG 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BAUG 22.4K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BAUG $55.05
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BAUG: Cost 40, Risk 54, Mission 100, Tradability 63, Holdings not scored, Durability 79. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BAUG, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBAUGXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherF18
Tradability15% weightB63HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightA79HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BAUG and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BAUG ranks 37th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 34CNVBTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Nov ETFScore 52
  2. Rank 37CBAUGInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  3. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BAUGCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BAUG A year of S&P 500 exposure with the first 9% of losses absorbed, in exchange for an upside cap set fresh every August 1. This is the August-reset seat in Innovator's buffer lineup, built to be held the full twelve months.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BAUG The Fund seeks returns linked to its underlying ETF, subject to a predetermined upside cap, while protecting against the first 9% of underlying losses during the applicable outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BAUG Mechanically simple: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's losses over the outcome period are absorbed, and upside runs to a cap reset each August 1.innovatoretfs.com
  • No style drift. It delivers the defined-outcome structure on its stated reference fund and nothing else, which is exactly what the prospectus advertises.
  • The 0.79% fee sits right at the median for annual buffer funds. You are not paying a premium for the August calendar slot.
  • Live since 2019, so it has run through multiple complete 12-month outcome cycles rather than being an untested launch.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BAUG Thinly traded next to its peers, so spreads can widen. Order type and timing matter more here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Buy mid-period and your own buffer and cap differ from the stated terms, which run August 1 to July 31 and are measured before the fund's fee.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper wrappers around the same idea exist: BUFB ladders buffers for 0.10%, and ZALT runs a quarterly reset at 0.69%.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BAUG profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BAUG vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BAUG vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BAUG vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BAUG 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BAUG 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BAUG $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBAUGXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BAUG
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BAUG 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BAUG vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BAUG No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
BAUG None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BAUG No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BAUG No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BAUG No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BAUG No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BAUGAll BAUG payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

BAUG vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BAUG
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BAUG 8.4%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BAUG 1.61, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BAUG −15.6%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BAUG 0.69XTR 0.94

BAUG and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BAUGCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAUGCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BAUGCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.