IPAC ranks 2nd and BBAX 4th of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
BBAX vs IPAC
IPAC −0.10pt a year
0.19%0.09%
BBAX 2.2×the volume
218K98.1K
IPAC +1.5pt
+6.6%+8.1%
BBAX vs IPAC Performance
+37.5%+47.6%
- BBAX 0.19%
- IPAC 0.09%, better
- BBAX $6.76B
- IPAC $2.67B
- BBAX +16.2%, better
- IPAC +15.6%
- BBAX 3.75%
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- BBAX 100
- IPAC 1344
- BBAX 218K sh, better
- IPAC 98.1K sh
- BBAX $62.58
- IPAC $82.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBAX | IPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A77Higher |
| Mission | B66 | A81Higher |
| Risk | B60 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | C47 |
| Holdings | D30 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | C51 |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. BBAX and IPAC are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBAXB
IPACA
In short
BBAX Developed Asia Pacific with Japan deliberately cut out: Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand in one ticket. The region's other half, indexed, at a price below the typical international blend fund.
IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.
Stated mandate
BBAX The fund is designed to provide indexed exposure to developed Asian Pacific equity markets while excluding Japan.
IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBAX vs IPAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBAX vs IPAC Cost
Overpaying BBAX vs IPAC
$2,054
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBAX 0.19%
$3,952
IPAC 0.09%
$1,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBAX | IPAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $165 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $646 | $705 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,898 | $2,054 |
- 0.19%BBAX
- 0.09%IPAC, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
BBAX 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
BBAX vs IPAC Dividends
- BBAX 3.75%
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- BBAX $2.36
- IPAC $3.20
- BBAX $0.79
- IPAC $0.88
- BBAX Sep 22, 2026
- IPAC Jun 15, 2026
- BBAX Sep 24, 2026
- IPAC Jun 18, 2026
- BBAX Quarterly
- IPAC Twice a year
Distribution history
BBAX vs IPAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBAX
- IPAC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBAX 13.7%IPAC 11.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBAX 0.94IPAC 1.18, better
- Worst fall
- BBAX −23.2%, betterIPAC −27.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BBAX 0.80IPAC 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.