Skip to content

IPAC vs VPL

iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

IPACANYSE Arca

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

VPLANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VPL −0.02pt a year

IPAC0.09%VPL0.07%

Avg volume · 30D

VPL 3.9×the volume

IPAC98.1KVPL382K

10Y return · a year

VPL +0.7pt

IPAC+8.4%VPL+9.1%

IPAC vs VPL Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+47.6%IPAC+56.3%VPL

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IPAC +47.6%. VPL +56.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IPAC 0.09%
VPL 0.07%, better
Fund size
IPAC $2.67B
VPL $13.5B
1Y total return
IPAC +15.6%
VPL +21.9%, better
Yield (12M)
IPAC 3.86%, better
VPL 2.23%
Holdings
IPAC 1344
VPL 2348
Avg volume (30D)
IPAC 98.1K sh
VPL 382K sh, better
NAV per share
IPAC $82.57
VPL $108.58
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IPAC: Cost 77, Risk 63, Mission 81, Tradability 47, Holdings 80, Durability 51. VPL: Cost 89, Risk 47, Mission 100, Tradability 43, Holdings 74, Durability 86.
Pillar letters and Scores for IPAC, VPL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIPACVPL
Cost30% weightA77A89Higher
Mission25% weightA81A100Higher
Risk15% weightB63HigherC47
Tradability15% weightC47HigherC43
Holdings10% weightA80HigherA74
Durability5% weightC51A86Higher

Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IPAC and VPL are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Asia-Pacific Region⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

VPL ranks 1st and IPAC 2nd of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.

  1. Rank 1AVPLVanguard FTSE Pacific ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AIPACiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 3BFLAXFranklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETFScore 57

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IPACAiShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF

VPLAVanguard FTSE Pacific ETF

In short

IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.

VPL Vanguard's scalpel for the developed Pacific: Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand, down to small caps, for 0.07% a year. Asia-Pacific without Europe bolted on, running since 2005.

Stated mandate

IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.

VPL VPL seeks to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, targeting Pacific-region common stocks through passive full replication.

Why people hold it

  • IPAC Charges 0.09% a year against a 0.35% median for its international cohort. Among its closest-graded peers, only VXUS (0.05%) costs less.
  • Follows the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index closely, among the tightest index-tracking in its peer group.ishares.com
  • "Investable Market" means small caps ride along with the blue chips: roughly 1,400 holdings rather than a short list of household names.
  • Sits in the top quartile of the broad international funds we grade, with no structural flags on the wrapper and a multi-billion-dollar asset base.
  • VPL Costs 0.07% a year, roughly a quarter of the 0.28% median in its international-blend group and well under broad rivals like ACWX at 0.32%.vanguard.com
  • Full replication, all-cap: roughly 2,400 stocks held in index weight, small caps included, rather than a large-cap sample of the region.vanguard.com
  • Trading since 2005 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that has tracked its benchmark tightly, one of the stronger implementations in its peer group.
  • FTSE's developed Asia Pacific map includes South Korea, so Korean names sit alongside Japanese and Australian ones in the same index.bogleheads.org

Worth knowing

  • IPAC One region, not the world. Broader options like VXUS hold developed and emerging markets across the globe in a single ticker.
  • A Pacific-only mandate rides on a handful of economies and their currencies, a narrower base than a globally spread stock fund.
  • Volume is moderate rather than heavy, so spreads can run wider than the largest international funds, and income arrives once or twice a year.
  • VPL Six developed markets, full stop. No Europe and no emerging Asia, so China, Taiwan and India sit outside the mandate.bogleheads.org
  • Japan is the region's largest market and the fund's heaviest weight, and currency is unhedged, so Japanese equities and yen moves shape a lot of the ride.vanguard.com
  • One region means bumpier ground than a global fund; it doesn't cover developed ex-US or all-world markets the way VEU or IXUS do.

Full IPAC profile⁠

Full VPL profile⁠

IPAC vs VPL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IPAC vs VPL Cost

Overpaying IPAC vs VPL

$418

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IPAC 0.09%

    $1,898

  • VPL 0.07%

    $1,480

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IPAC 0.09%
  • VPL 0.07%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$500$1K$1.5K$2K051015202530IPAC $1,898VPL $1,480

Year by year

YearIPACVPLOverpaying
10$165$128$37
20$646$503$143
30$1,898$1,480$418

Expense ratio

  • 0.09%IPAC
  • 0.07%VPL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
  • Median 0.19%

VPL cheapest of 7 funds

IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

IPAC vs VPL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IPAC 3.86%, better
VPL 2.23%
Payout (12M)
IPAC $3.20
VPL $2.42
Last payment
IPAC $0.88
VPL $2.42
Ex-dividend
IPAC Jun 15, 2026
VPL Dec 19, 2025
Paid on
IPAC Jun 18, 2026
VPL Dec 23, 2025
Frequency
IPAC Twice a year
VPL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IPACTwice a year · 20 paymentsAll IPAC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 20 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.64; Dec 19, 2017 $1.14; Jun 19, 2018 $0.72; Dec 18, 2018 $0.78; Jun 17, 2019 $0.82; Dec 16, 2019 $1.15; Jun 15, 2020 $0.58; Dec 14, 2020 $0.50; Jun 10, 2021 $0.81; Dec 13, 2021 $1.56; Dec 30, 2021 $0.21; Jun 9, 2022 $0.95; Dec 13, 2022 $0.53; Jun 7, 2023 $0.78; Dec 20, 2023 $1.11; Jun 11, 2024 $0.80; Dec 17, 2024 $1.29; Jun 16, 2025 $0.85; Dec 16, 2025 $2.32; Jun 15, 2026 $0.88. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
VPLQuarterly · 36 paymentsAll VPL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 36 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.13; Jun 21, 2017 $0.49; Sep 20, 2017 $0.29; Dec 19, 2017 $0.96; Mar 26, 2018 $0.11; Jun 22, 2018 $0.52; Sep 26, 2018 $0.24; Dec 24, 2018 $0.97; Mar 25, 2019 $0.13; Jun 17, 2019 $0.52; Sep 24, 2019 $0.26; Dec 23, 2019 $1.07; Mar 23, 2020 $0.01; Jun 22, 2020 $0.23; Sep 21, 2020 $0.31; Dec 21, 2020 $0.88; Mar 22, 2021 $0.16; Jun 21, 2021 $0.50; Sep 20, 2021 $0.36; Dec 20, 2021 $1.47; Mar 21, 2022 $0.05; Jun 21, 2022 $0.55; Sep 19, 2022 $0.15; Dec 19, 2022 $1.03; Mar 20, 2023 $0.15; Jun 20, 2023 $0.52; Sep 18, 2023 $0.28; Dec 18, 2023 $1.30; Mar 15, 2024 $0.29; Jun 21, 2024 $0.20; Sep 20, 2024 $0.51; Dec 20, 2024 $1.24; Mar 21, 2025 $0.42; Jun 20, 2025 $0.18; Sep 19, 2025 $0.61; Dec 19, 2025 $2.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

IPAC vs VPL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IPAC
  • VPL
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: VPL −28.3% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IPAC 11.9%, betterVPL 16.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IPAC 1.18, betterVPL 1.06
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IPAC −27.1%, betterVPL −28.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IPAC 0.86VPL 1.10

Popular comparisons

  • IPACAvsFLAXB

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VPLAvsFLAXB

    Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF · Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.07% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IPACAvsBBAXB

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VPLAvsBBAXB

    Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF · JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.07% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IPACAvsEPPC

    iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF · iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.09% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VPLAvsEPPC

    Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF · iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.07% · 0.47%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.