VPL ranks 1st and IPAC 2nd of 7 funds in the Asia-Pacific Region Category.
IPAC vs VPL
VPL −0.02pt a year
0.09%0.07%
VPL 3.9×the volume
98.1K382K
VPL +0.7pt
+8.4%+9.1%
IPAC vs VPL Performance
+47.6%+56.3%
- IPAC 0.09%
- VPL 0.07%, better
- IPAC $2.67B
- VPL $13.5B
- IPAC +15.6%
- VPL +21.9%, better
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- VPL 2.23%
- IPAC 1344
- VPL 2348
- IPAC 98.1K sh
- VPL 382K sh, better
- IPAC $82.57
- VPL $108.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IPAC | VPL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B63Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | C43 |
| Holdings | A80Higher | A74 |
| Durability | C51 | A86Higher |
Rank among Asia-Pacific Region funds
Same Category. IPAC and VPL are both graded against the same 7 Asia-Pacific Region funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IPACA
VPLA
In short
IPAC The developed Pacific in one line item: roughly 1,400 large, mid and small caps for 0.09% a year, well under the 0.35% median for its international peer group. iShares has run it as a core building block since 2014.
VPL Vanguard's scalpel for the developed Pacific: Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand, down to small caps, for 0.07% a year. Asia-Pacific without Europe bolted on, running since 2005.
Stated mandate
IPAC The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid-, and small-cap equities from the Pacific region.
VPL VPL seeks to track the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index, targeting Pacific-region common stocks through passive full replication.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IPAC vs VPL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IPAC vs VPL Cost
Overpaying IPAC vs VPL
$418
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IPAC 0.09%
$1,898
VPL 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IPAC | VPL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $128 | $37 |
| 20 | $646 | $503 | $143 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,480 | $418 |
- 0.09%IPAC
- 0.07%VPL, cheaper
- Middle half of Asia-Pacific Region funds
- Median 0.19%
VPL cheapest of 7 funds
IPAC 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
IPAC vs VPL Dividends
- IPAC 3.86%, better
- VPL 2.23%
- IPAC $3.20
- VPL $2.42
- IPAC $0.88
- VPL $2.42
- IPAC Jun 15, 2026
- VPL Dec 19, 2025
- IPAC Jun 18, 2026
- VPL Dec 23, 2025
- IPAC Twice a year
- VPL Quarterly
Distribution history
IPAC vs VPL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IPAC
- VPL
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IPAC 11.9%, betterVPL 16.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IPAC 1.18, betterVPL 1.06
- Worst fall
- IPAC −27.1%, betterVPL −28.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IPAC 0.86VPL 1.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.