EWC ranks 1st and BBCA 4th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EWC
BBCA −0.31pt a year
0.19%0.50%
EWC 5.1×the volume
330K1.68M
BBCA +0.1pt
+11.5%+11.4%
BBCA vs EWC Performance
+72.5%+71.2%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EWC 0.50%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EWC $7.58B
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EWC +21.1%
- BBCA 1.68%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- BBCA 78
- EWC 83
- BBCA 330K sh
- EWC 1.68M sh, better
- BBCA $104.51
- EWC $60.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EWC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B59 | A90Higher |
| Risk | A87 | A87 |
| Tradability | B55 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A76 | A78Higher |
| Durability | B58 | A80Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EWC are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EWCA
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EWC A 1996 original: Canada's large and mid caps in one ticker, back when single-country funds were still a novelty. About 80 names, held through a capped MSCI index built so one giant can't swamp the basket.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EWC The fund seeks to track an index representing Canadian equities, providing exposure to large- and mid-sized companies in Canada.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EWC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EWC Cost
Overpaying EWC vs BBCA
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EWC 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EWC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $900 | $553 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,460 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,979 | $6,027 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.50%EWC
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWC 14th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EWC Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%, better
- EWC 1.24%
- BBCA $1.75
- EWC $0.75
- BBCA $0.42
- EWC $0.28
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EWC Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EWC Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EWC Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EWC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EWC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%, betterEWC 13.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEWC 1.54
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEWC −24.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EWC 0.88Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
BBCA and EWC in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





