BBCA ranks 4th and EWU 6th of 38 funds in the Developed Single Country Category.
BBCA vs EWU
BBCA −0.31pt a year
0.19%0.50%
EWU 3.5×the volume
330K1.15M
EWU +0.1pt
+11.5%+11.6%
BBCA vs EWU Performance
+72.5%+72.8%
- BBCA 0.19%, better
- EWU 0.50%
- BBCA $11.9B
- EWU $3.73B
- BBCA +22.1%, better
- EWU +15.9%
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWU 3.13%, better
- BBCA 78
- EWU 72
- BBCA 330K sh
- EWU 1.15M sh, better
- BBCA $104.51
- EWU $47.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBCA | EWU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | B55 |
| Mission | B59 | A71Higher |
| Risk | A87Higher | A75 |
| Tradability | B55 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B69 |
| Durability | B58 | A78Higher |
Rank among Developed Single Country funds
Same Category. BBCA and EWU are both graded against the same 38 Developed Single Country funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBCAA
EWUB
In short
BBCA Canada, at a discount. BBCA tracks a Morningstar index of roughly 80 Canadian stocks for 0.19% a year, a fraction of what most single-country funds charge, and it has grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund since its 2018 launch.
EWU Trading since 1996, EWU is the veteran one-ticker route into British blue chips: roughly 70 UK stocks in a single MSCI-tracked basket, held through Brexit, rate cycles and everything in between.
Stated mandate
BBCA The fund seeks to track the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index before fees and expenses. It uses a passive indexing approach to approximate the index rather than outperform it.
EWU The fund seeks to track an index of U.K. equities, providing targeted exposure to companies in the United Kingdom and a way to express a single-country investment view.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBCA vs EWU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBCA vs EWU Cost
Overpaying EWU vs BBCA
$6,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBCA 0.19%
$3,952
EWU 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBCA | EWU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $900 | $553 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $3,460 | $2,109 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $9,979 | $6,027 |
- 0.19%BBCA, cheaper
- 0.50%EWU
- Middle half of Developed Single Country funds
- Median 0.50%
BBCA 7th cheapest of 38 funds
EWU 14th cheapest of 38 funds
BBCA vs EWU Dividends
- BBCA 1.68%
- EWU 3.13%, better
- BBCA $1.75
- EWU $1.50
- BBCA $0.42
- EWU $0.67
- BBCA Sep 22, 2026
- EWU Jun 15, 2026
- BBCA Sep 24, 2026
- EWU Jun 18, 2026
- BBCA Quarterly
- EWU Twice a year
Distribution history
BBCA vs EWU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BBCA
- EWU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBCA 12.9%EWU 10.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BBCA 1.55, betterEWU 1.40
- Worst fall
- BBCA −24.4%, betterEWU −24.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BBCA 0.88EWU 0.71
BBCA and EWU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




