BBHL vs QIDX: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

BBH Select Large Cap ETF

BBHLCNYSE Arca

Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

QIDXBNYSE Arca

Overlap

19.5%by weight

Expense ratio

QIDX −0.21pt a year

BBHL0.71%QIDX0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

BBHL 9.7×the volume

BBHL38KQIDX3.94K

BBHL vs QIDX Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+8.9%BBHL+8.5%QIDX

Expense ratio: BBHL 0.71%; QIDX 0.50%, better
Fund size: BBHL $530M; QIDX $39M
1Y total return: BBHL No data; QIDX +8.7%
Yield (12M): BBHL No data; QIDX 0.91%
Holdings: BBHL 50; QIDX 130
Avg volume (30D): BBHL 38K sh, better; QIDX 3.94K sh
NAV per share: BBHL $17.47; QIDX $11.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for BBHL, QIDX, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	BBHL	QIDX
Cost30% weight	D38	A75Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	Not scored
Risk15% weight	B66	A76Higher
Tradability15% weight	C53Higher	F23
Holdings10% weight	B69	A93Higher
Durability5% weight	A78Higher	C45

Rank among US Active Quality funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. BBHL and QIDX are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds

See all 16 ›

QIDX ranks 4th and BBHL 8th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
Rank 7CJGRWJensen Quality Growth ETFScore 54
Rank 8CBBHLBBH Select Large Cap ETFScore 53
Rank 9CEQTYKovitz Core Equity ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BBHLCBBH Select Large Cap ETF

QIDXBIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF

In short

BBHL No data

QIDX An active quality fund stitched from Indexperts' own house indexes: steady-earnings names across large, mid and small caps, with a manager free to override the rules. It charges less than the typical fund in its peer group.

Stated mandate

BBHL No data

QIDX The Fund seeks total return.

Why people hold it

BBHL No data

QIDX Charges 0.50% a year, below the median for its quality-focused peer group and about half what the priciest name in that group (EQTY, 0.99%) asks.
Rules first, judgment second: the portfolio is drawn from Indexperts' own growth and consistent-value indexes, with the advisor free to trim or exclude.sec.gov
Reaches across large, mid and small caps instead of hugging a handful of mega caps, and the portfolio build ranks among the stronger ones in its peer group.sec.gov
A plain 1940 Act equity fund seeking total return, with cash paid out quarterly. No leverage, no options overlay, no derivatives wrapper to decode.

Worth knowing

BBHL No data

QIDX Listed at the end of 2024, so the track record is short and any read on its risk profile rests on limited history.
Small and thinly traded: spreads can run wider than on giant index funds, and size of order matters more.
You are paying 0.50% for a manager's judgment when index-built quality rivals like PSET run 0.15%.

Full BBHL profile⁠

Full QIDX profile⁠

BBHL vs QIDX Holdings

How BBHL and QIDX differ

Overlap by weight

19.5%

Shared holdings make up 48.7% of BBHL and 22.3% of QIDX.

Level by level

Holdings18 in both19.5%
Countryby domicile98.8%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for QIDX.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BBHL and QIDX, widest gap first
Country	More in BBHLMore in QIDX	BBHL	QIDX
Singapore	QIDX +0.6 points	0.0%	0.6%
Sweden	QIDX +0.5 points	0.0%	0.5%
Other countries (3)	BBHL +1.1 points	100.0%	98.8%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

BBHL46.3%
QIDX25.0%

Securities held

BBHL49
QIDX129

Asset class

BBHL: Equity
QIDX: Equity

Holdings

Only in BBHL31
In both18
Only in QIDX111

Only in BBHL

31 securities, 46.4% of BBHL by weight

Alphabet Inc-Cl C5.24%
Amazon.com Inc4.99%
Waste Management Inc3.87%
NVIDIA Corp2.78%
Rockwell Automation Inc2.60%
Texas Instruments Inc2.47%
Johnson & Johnson2.43%
Applied Materials Inc2.19%
Parker Hannifin Corp2.13%
Arthur J Gallagher & Co1.85%
Oracle Corp1.64%
Broadcom Inc1.55%
Meta Platforms Inc-Class A1.50%
Coca-Cola Co/The1.15%
BlackRock Inc1.04%
Analog Devices Inc1.00%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.96%
Medtronic PLC0.84%
Home Depot Inc0.80%
Ecolab Inc0.72%
Spotify Technology SA0.72%
Zoetis Inc0.71%
Booking Holdings Inc0.70%
Mcdonalds Corp0.66%
Alcon Inc0.52%
Otis Worldwide Corp0.33%
Compass Group Plc-Spon Adr0.25%
Taiwan Semiconductor-Sp Adr0.24%
Nike Inc -Cl B0.23%
Graco Inc0.15%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.15%

Only in QIDX

111 securities, 75.2% of QIDX by weight

Arista Networks, Inc.3.56%
Alphabet Inc. Class A2.59%
HEICO Corporation2.55%
Xom2.40%
Altria Group Ord1.87%
Cencora, Inc.1.79%
Williams Co INC1.77%
Cisco Systems, Inc.1.75%
F5 Ord1.73%
Verizon Communications Ord1.49%
Kroger Co.1.44%
International Business Machines Corporation1.34%
AutoZone, Inc.1.31%
Stryker Corporation1.21%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation Class A1.19%
Amphenol Class A Ord1.15%
VICI Properties Inc1.13%
NRG Energy, Inc.1.13%
Hormel Foods Corporation1.06%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.03%
T-Mobile US, Inc.0.96%
Aecom Ord0.94%
Gev0.86%
Travelers Companies, Inc.0.84%
Royal Caribbean Group Ord0.84%
Graham Holdings Class B Ord0.82%
Acadian Asset Management Inc0.78%
Dorman Products Ord0.77%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Ord0.75%
Timken Company0.72%
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated0.71%
Ralph Lauren Corporation Class A0.70%
Caterpillar Inc.0.69%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.0.66%
American Express Company0.65%
PACCAR Inc0.65%
Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.0.65%
Centene Corporation0.65%
TJX Companies Inc0.64%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.0.64%
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. Class A0.63%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.0.62%
Caci International Class A Ord0.62%
Matson, Inc.0.60%
Packaging Corporation of America0.60%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.0.57%
DexCom, Inc.0.57%
Lowe's Companies, Inc.0.57%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.0.56%
American Financial Group, Inc.0.55%

Weight gaps

All 18 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BBHL and QIDX, widest gap first
Holding	More in BBHLMore in QIDX	BBHL	QIDX
Microsoft CorpMSFT	BBHL +6.09 points	6.76%	0.67%
Mastercard Inc - AMA	BBHL +3.97 points	4.63%	0.66%
Apple IncAAPL	BBHL +3.35 points	5.79%	2.44%
Linde PLCLIN	BBHL +2.62 points	3.30%	0.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific IncTMO	QIDX +2.41 points	0.95%	3.36%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc-Cl BBRK.B	BBHL +2.03 points	3.65%	1.62%
Progressive CorpPGR	BBHL +2.01 points	2.50%	0.49%
Kla CorpKLAC	BBHL +1.91 points	3.16%	1.25%
Eli Lilly & CoLLY	BBHL +1.79 points	3.03%	1.24%
Cadence Design Sys IncCDNS	BBHL +1.72 points	2.34%	0.62%
Palo Alto Networks IncPANW	BBHL +1.72 points	2.78%	1.06%
Walmart IncWMT	BBHL +0.59 points	2.49%	1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & CoJPM	BBHL +0.52 points	1.50%	0.98%
Abbott LaboratoriesABT	QIDX +0.42 points	0.79%	1.21%
Costco Wholesale CorpCOST	BBHL +0.29 points	1.82%	1.53%
Servicenow IncNOW	BBHL +0.28 points	0.60%	0.32%
Hilton Worldwide HldgsHLT	BBHL +0.20 points	1.09%	0.89%
S&P Global IncSPGI	BBHL +0.09 points	1.49%	1.40%

All BBHL holdings⁠All 130 QIDX holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BBHL vs QIDX Cost

Overpaying BBHL vs QIDX

$3,803

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

BBHL 0.71%
$13,782
QIDX 0.50%
$9,979

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

BBHL 0.71%
QIDX 0.50%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	BBHL	QIDX	Overpaying
10	$1,267	$900	$367
20	$4,824	$3,460	$1,364
30	$13,782	$9,979	$3,803

Expense ratio

0.71%BBHL
0.50%QIDX, cheaper

QIDX0.50%BBHL0.71%

0.40%1.52%

Middle half of US Active Quality funds
Median 0.65%

QIDX 4th cheapest of 16 funds

BBHL 9th cheapest of 16 funds

BBHL vs QIDX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Yield (12M): BBHL No data; QIDX 0.91%
Payout (12M): BBHL None; QIDX $0.11
Last payment: BBHL No data; QIDX $0.03
Ex-dividend: BBHL No data; QIDX Sep 29, 2026
Paid on: BBHL No data; QIDX Sep 30, 2026
Frequency: BBHL No data; QIDX Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BBHLAll BBHL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QIDXQuarterly · 7 paymentsAll QIDX payments⁠

BBHL vs QIDX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: BBHL No dataQIDX 9.9%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: BBHL No dataQIDX 0.25since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: BBHL No dataQIDX −15.0%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: BBHL 0.87QIDX 0.57; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

BBHLCvsNPFEA
BBH Select Large Cap ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.71% · 0.40%
Category
QIDXBvsNPFEA
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.40%
Category
BBHLCvsQLTYA
BBH Select Large Cap ETF · GMO US Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.71% · 0.50%
Category
QIDXBvsQLTYA
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · GMO US Quality ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
BBHLCvsAQECB
BBH Select Large Cap ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.71% · 0.49%
Category
QIDXBvsAQECB
Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.49%
Category