BBLB ranks 2nd and TLT 4th of 11 funds in the Treasuries (20+ Year) Category.
BBLB vs TLT
BBLB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
TLT 23375.7×the volume
1.49K34.8M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+3.6%+3.6%
BBLB vs TLT Performance
−5.1%−5.1%
- BBLB 0.04%, better
- TLT 0.15%
- BBLB $36M
- TLT $47.5B
- BBLB −5.1%
- TLT −5.1%
- BBLB 5.02%, better
- TLT 4.75%
- BBLB 41
- TLT 49
- BBLB 1.49K sh
- TLT 34.8M sh, better
- BBLB $77.21
- TLT $81.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBLB | TLT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D37 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B57 | B57 |
| Tradability | D27 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | B64 |
| Durability | D33 | A89Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
Same Category. BBLB and TLT are both graded against the same 11 Treasuries (20+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBLBA
TLTB
In short
BBLB The same 20+ year Treasury index the category's household name tracks, at a fraction of the fee. A plain, cheap wrapper on the long end of the curve, still small and young by category standards.
TLT The long bond's most famous ticker. iShares launched TLT in 2002, and it became the default way to take a view on 20-year-plus Treasuries: index-tracked, heavily traded, with a deep listed options market.
Stated mandate
BBLB The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index.
TLT The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury bonds with remaining maturities greater than twenty years, providing targeted exposure to long-duration government debt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBLB vs TLT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBLB vs TLT Cost
Overpaying TLT vs BBLB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBLB 0.04%
$849
TLT 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBLB | TLT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%BBLB, cheaper
- 0.15%TLT
- Middle half of Treasuries (20+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
BBLB 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
TLT 6th cheapest of 11 funds
BBLB vs TLT Dividends
- BBLB 5.02%, better
- TLT 4.75%
- BBLB $3.88
- TLT $3.89
- BBLB $0.34
- TLT $0.31
- BBLB Oct 1, 2026
- TLT Oct 1, 2026
- BBLB Oct 5, 2026
- TLT Oct 6, 2026
- BBLB Monthly
- TLT Monthly
Distribution history
BBLB vs TLT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBLB 13.3%, betterTLT 13.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBLB −0.003TLT −0.002, better
- Worst fall
- BBLB −21.0%TLT −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BBLB 2.40TLT 2.40Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





