BBSB ranks 4th and UTWO 9th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
BBSB vs UTWO
BBSB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
UTWO 56.9×the volume
1.99K113K
BBSB +0.3pt
+4.2%+3.9%
BBSB vs UTWO Performance
+2.2%+1.9%
- BBSB 0.04%, better
- UTWO 0.15%
- BBSB $55M
- UTWO $520M
- BBSB +2.2%, better
- UTWO +1.9%
- BBSB 4.12%, better
- UTWO 4.02%
- BBSB 92
- UTWO 2
- BBSB 1.99K sh
- UTWO 113K sh, better
- BBSB $97.77
- UTWO $47.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSB | UTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C43 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | D34 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | B66Higher | D33 |
| Durability | D35 | B57Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. BBSB and UTWO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSBA
UTWOB
In short
BBSB A plain box of short Treasuries at 0.04%, well under what the category's longtime benchmark fund charges for the very same ICE index. About 90 bonds, monthly income, no story beyond the math.
UTWO Most short Treasury funds hand you a 1-3 year blend. UTWO aims at a single spot on the curve, the 2-year note segment, and pays monthly. A precision tool from F/m, on the market since 2022.
Stated mandate
BBSB The fund seeks current income by tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. It uses representative sampling to closely replicate the index's characteristics.
UTWO The fund is designed to provide exposure to the U.S. Treasury 2-year note segment. It may invest up to 20% of assets outside its underlying index when the adviser believes those investments will improve tracking.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSB vs UTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSB vs UTWO Cost
Overpaying UTWO vs BBSB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSB 0.04%
$849
UTWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSB | UTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%BBSB, cheaper
- 0.15%UTWO
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
BBSB 4th cheapest of 15 funds
UTWO 8th cheapest of 15 funds
BBSB vs UTWO Dividends
- BBSB 4.12%, better
- UTWO 4.02%
- BBSB $4.02
- UTWO $1.91
- BBSB $0.33
- UTWO $0.18
- BBSB Nov 2, 2026
- UTWO Oct 27, 2026
- BBSB Pays Nov 4, 2026
- UTWO Oct 28, 2026
- BBSB Monthly
- UTWO Monthly
Distribution history
BBSB vs UTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSB 1.6%, betterUTWO 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSB −0.19, betterUTWO −0.36
- Worst fall
- BBSB −1.6%UTWO −2.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BBSB 0.23UTWO 0.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.