SCHO ranks 1st and UTWO 9th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
SCHO vs UTWO
SCHO −0.12pt a year
0.03%0.15%
SCHO 40.2×the volume
4.55M113K
SCHO +0.3pt
+4.2%+3.9%
SCHO vs UTWO Performance
+2.1%+1.9%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- UTWO 0.15%
- SCHO $15.7B
- UTWO $520M
- SCHO +2.1%, better
- UTWO +1.9%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- UTWO 4.02%
- SCHO 97
- UTWO 2
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- UTWO 113K sh
- SCHO $24.01
- UTWO $47.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SCHO | UTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | C43 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D33 |
| Durability | A77Higher | B57 |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. SCHO and UTWO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SCHOA
UTWOB
In short
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
UTWO Most short Treasury funds hand you a 1-3 year blend. UTWO aims at a single spot on the curve, the 2-year note segment, and pays monthly. A precision tool from F/m, on the market since 2022.
Stated mandate
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
UTWO The fund is designed to provide exposure to the U.S. Treasury 2-year note segment. It may invest up to 20% of assets outside its underlying index when the adviser believes those investments will improve tracking.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SCHO vs UTWO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SCHO vs UTWO Cost
Overpaying UTWO vs SCHO
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SCHO 0.03%
$638
UTWO 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SCHO | UTWO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $274 | $219 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,071 | $855 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,137 | $2,499 |
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- 0.15%UTWO
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
UTWO 8th cheapest of 15 funds
SCHO vs UTWO Dividends
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- UTWO 4.02%
- SCHO $1.00
- UTWO $1.91
- SCHO $0.08
- UTWO $0.18
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- UTWO Oct 27, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- UTWO Oct 28, 2026
- SCHO Monthly
- UTWO Monthly
Distribution history
SCHO vs UTWO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SCHO 1.7%UTWO 1.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- SCHO −0.17, betterUTWO −0.36
- Worst fall
- SCHO −5.4%UTWO −2.0%
- Market sensitivity
- SCHO 0.23UTWO 0.23Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.