Skip to content

BCTK vs TRUT

Baron Technology ETF

BCTKDNasdaq

VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

TRUTANasdaq

Overlap

19.4%by weight

Expense ratio

TRUT −0.61pt a year

BCTK0.75%TRUT0.14%

Avg volume · 30D

TRUT 4.2×the volume

BCTK43.3KTRUT182K

BCTK vs TRUT Performance

Dec 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.6%BCTK+18.1%TRUT

Dec 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BCTK +9.6%. TRUT +18.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%30%Dec 2025Jun 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BCTK 0.75%
TRUT 0.14%, better
Fund size
BCTK $257M
TRUT $238M
1Y total return
BCTK No data
TRUT +12.7%
Yield (12M)
BCTK No data
TRUT 0.35%
Holdings
BCTK 37
TRUT 77
Avg volume (30D)
BCTK 43.3K sh
TRUT 182K sh, better
NAV per share
BCTK $27.49
TRUT $31.15
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BCTK: Cost 26, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 56, Holdings 67, Durability 58. TRUT: Cost 93, Risk 23, Mission not scored, Tradability 96, Holdings 31, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for BCTK, TRUT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBCTKTRUT
Cost30% weightD26A93Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightF23F23
Tradability15% weightB56A96Higher
Holdings10% weightB67HigherD31
Durability5% weightB58B61Higher

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BCTK and TRUT are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TRUT ranks 4th and BCTK 28th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2BTMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4ATRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 5BUTESVirtus Reaves Utilities ETFScore 66
  6. Rank 23CTRUHVanEck Healthcare TruSector ETFScore 40
  7. Rank 28DBCTKBaron Technology ETFScore 39
  8. Rank 29DMEDIHarbor Health Care ETF (MEDI)Score 37

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BCTKDBaron Technology ETF

TRUTAVanEck Technology TruSector ETF

In short

BCTK Baron made its name picking growth stocks and holding on. BCTK is that playbook in an ETF wrapper: an actively chosen, global technology portfolio built around companies the manager thinks have durable growth, not whatever an index prints.

TRUT Diversification rules force most tech ETFs to trim their biggest names. TRUT's answer: own the giants directly up to the legal line, then top up with sector ETFs so the portfolio mirrors the sector's real shape.

Stated mandate

BCTK The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in U.S. and non-U.S. technology companies selected for durable growth potential associated with technological development and use.

TRUT The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through active investment in securities of information technology-related companies or instruments providing exposure to them.

Why people hold it

  • BCTK Genuinely global tech mandate. The manager can own non-US names alongside US ones, so the portfolio isn't fenced into the usual American megacap roster.
  • A narrow, legible job: capital appreciation from technology companies picked for durable growth. You know exactly what you own and exactly what to judge it against.
  • High-conviction active management, not a closet index. Stock selection, not index weights, drives what's in the portfolio.
  • Live since a December 2021 launch, so there's a real track record to inspect rather than a backtest.
  • TRUT The mechanism is the point. Fund rules cap one stock at 25% and stocks above 5% at 50% combined; TRUT fills the gap with targeted sector ETFs instead of overweighting smaller names.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • 0.14% a year for an actively managed fund, against a median near 0.65% across active US equity peers. Cheap enough to sit alongside index products.
  • One of the two originals in VanEck's TruSector line, launched in 2025. The approach has since been extended across all 11 GICS sectors.vaneck.comvaneck.com 2
  • About 80 positions, quarterly distributions, and steady day-to-day trading. On cost and tradability it lands in the upper tier of its active US equity cohort.

Worth knowing

  • BCTK 0.75% a year is the price of the stock picker, and it sits above the typical active US equity ETF. The picks have to clear that bar.
  • Thinly traded next to the index giants. Spreads can widen, so how you place the order matters more here than in a mega-fund.
  • One sector, concentrated. Against active US equity peers it lands in the bottom quartile on our overall read, with cost and volatility the main drags.
  • TRUT Part of the exposure arrives through other ETFs rather than shares the fund holds outright. That is the workaround that makes uncapped weights possible, and it adds a layer.vaneck.com
  • Uncapped means concentrated. Leaning fully into tech's largest companies ties results to a handful of mega-caps more tightly than a capped sector fund would.vaneck.com
  • Launched August 2025, so there is only a short record of how closely the hybrid build actually shadows an uncapped tech benchmark.

Full BCTK profile⁠

Full TRUT profile⁠

BCTK vs TRUT Holdings

How BCTK and TRUT differ

Overlap by weight

19.4%

Shared holdings make up 38.3% of BCTK and 28.8% of TRUT.

Level by level

  • Holdings12 in both19.4%
  • Countryby domicile87.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for BCTK and TRUT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BCTK and TRUT, widest gap first
CountryMore in BCTKMore in TRUT
United StatesTRUT +12.1 points
TaiwanBCTK +6.1 points
CanadaBCTK +4.3 points
NetherlandsBCTK +2.1 points
Other countries (2)TRUT +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BCTK55.6%
  • TRUT86.5%

Securities held

  • BCTK36
  • TRUT76

Asset class

BCTK
Equity
TRUT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BCTK24
  • In both12
  • Only in TRUT64

Only in BCTK

24 securities, 61.2% of BCTK by weight

  • Space Exploration Techn Class A6.63%
  • Taiwan Semiconductor Sp Adr6.02%
  • Spotify Technology SA5.84%

Only in TRUT

64 securities, 71.1% of TRUT by weight

  • Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund30.70%
  • Apple Inc15.40%
  • Microsoft Corp11.91%

Weight gaps

All 12 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in BCTK and TRUT, widest gap first
HoldingMore in BCTKMore in TRUT
NVIDIA CorpNVDATRUT +7.53 points
Lam Research CorpLRCXBCTK +5.31 points
Micron Technology IncMUBCTK +2.38 points
Advanced Micro DevicesAMDBCTK +2.23 points
Lumentum Holdings IncLITEBCTK +2.04 points
Broadcom IncAVGOTRUT +1.90 points
Monolithic Power Systems IncMPWRBCTK +1.68 points
Coherent CorpCOHRBCTK +1.67 points

All BCTK holdings⁠All 75 TRUT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BCTK vs TRUT Cost

Overpaying BCTK vs TRUT

$11,550

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BCTK 0.75%

    $14,482

  • TRUT 0.14%

    $2,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BCTK 0.75%
  • TRUT 0.14%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530BCTK $14,482TRUT $2,932

Year by year

YearBCTKTRUTOverpaying
10$1,336$256$1,080
20$5,078$1,000$4,078
30$14,482$2,932$11,550

Expense ratio

  • 0.75%BCTK
  • 0.14%TRUT, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TRUT 3rd cheapest of 35 funds

BCTK 26th cheapest of 35 funds

BCTK vs TRUT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BCTK No data
TRUT 0.35%
Payout (12M)
BCTK No data
TRUT $0.11
Last payment
BCTK $0.05
TRUT $0.03
Ex-dividend
BCTK Sep 22, 2026
TRUT Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
BCTK Sep 23, 2026
TRUT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
BCTK Irregular
TRUT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

BCTKIrregular · 1 paymentAll BCTK payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Sep 22, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD
TRUTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll TRUT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Oct 1, 2025 $0.01; Dec 29, 2025 $0.02; Apr 1, 2026 $0.03; Jul 1, 2026 $0.03; Oct 1, 2026 $0.03. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD

BCTK vs TRUT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BCTK No dataTRUT 26.8%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BCTK No dataTRUT 0.78since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BCTK No dataTRUT −18.6%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BCTK 1.60TRUT 1.76

Popular comparisons

  • BCTKDvsAVREA

    Baron Technology ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsAVREA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BCTKDvsPSRA

    Baron Technology ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsPSRA

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BCTKDvsTMEDB

    Baron Technology ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TRUTAvsTMEDB

    VanEck Technology TruSector ETF · T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.