Skip to content

BDEC vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BDECCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BDEC0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SIXJ 2.3×the volume

BDEC6.53KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BDEC +0.7pt

BDEC+15.2%SIXJ+14.5%

BDEC vs SIXJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.8%BDEC+10.7%SIXJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BDEC +11.8%. SIXJ +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BDEC 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BDEC $206M
SIXJ $146M
1Y total return
BDEC +11.8%, better
SIXJ +10.7%
Holdings
BDEC 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BDEC 6.53K sh
SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
NAV per share
BDEC $52.91
SIXJ $36.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BDEC: Cost 40, Risk 37, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BDEC, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBDECSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD37A72Higher
Tradability15% weightB59A72Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightB69HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BDEC and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 2nd and BDEC 47th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 65
  5. Rank 43CFSEPFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 46
  6. Rank 47CBDECInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 45
  7. Rank 47CFMAYFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - MayScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BDECCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BDEC Innovator invented the buffer ETF, and BDEC is the December door into that lineup: SPY's price moves with the first 9% of losses absorbed, the upside capped, and the whole deal reset every December 1.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BDEC The Fund uses a defined-outcome strategy intended to replicate its underlying ETF over an approximately one-year period, subject to a capped upside and protection against the first 9% of losses.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BDEC The terms are written down before you commit: 9% of the reference ETF's price losses absorbed (before the 0.79% fee) over a roughly one-year period, with the new cap published each December 1.sec.gov
  • At 0.79% the fee sits at the category median, and it undercuts the dated buffer funds built on the same reference (FDEC, FJUL, FMAR and siblings at 0.85%).
  • One rung in a twelve-month series from the shop that listed the first defined-outcome ETFs in 2018. BDEC has been running its December reset since 2019.globenewswire.com
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BDEC Timing is the whole game. The buffer and cap are built for holders from the first day of the outcome period to the last; buy mid-period and your actual terms differ from the headline ones.sec.gov
  • You get SPY's price return, not its dividends: the fund's options don't collect them, so income isn't part of the design.sec.gov
  • Trading is thin for a fund of this size, so limit orders and a look at the spread earn their keep.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BDEC profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BDEC vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BDEC vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BDEC vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BDEC 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BDEC 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BDEC $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBDECSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BDEC
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BDEC 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BDEC vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BDEC None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

BDECAll BDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BDEC vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BDEC 8.6%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BDEC 1.33SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BDEC −16.4%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BDEC 0.72SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BDECCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDECCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BDECCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.