CMDT ranks 4th and BDRY 13th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
BDRY vs CMDT
CMDT −2.85pt a year
3.50%0.65%
CMDT 1.02×the volume
64.6K65.9K
BDRY +20.3pt
+34.5%+14.2%
BDRY vs CMDT Performance
+50.5%+28.0%
- BDRY 3.50%
- CMDT 0.65%, better
- BDRY $25M
- CMDT $890M
- BDRY +50.5%, better
- CMDT +28.0%
- BDRY
- CMDT 12.09%
- BDRY 17
- CMDT 357
- BDRY 64.6K sh
- CMDT 65.9K sh, better
- BDRY $12.40
- CMDT $31.84
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BDRY | CMDT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F1 | B61Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D30 | A81Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | B57 | A70Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A72Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. BDRY and CMDT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BDRYF
CMDTB
In short
BDRY Shipping stocks are a proxy. BDRY buys the thing itself: near-dated futures on dry bulk freight rate indexes, so it moves with what it costs to haul iron ore, coal and grain across an ocean.
CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.
Stated mandate
BDRY The Fund seeks exposure to daily changes in dry bulk freight futures through a portfolio of near-dated futures contracts on indexes measuring dry bulk shipping rates.
CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BDRY vs CMDT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BDRY vs CMDT Cost
Overpaying BDRY vs CMDT
$35,338
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BDRY 3.50%
$48,055
CMDT 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BDRY | CMDT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $5,566 | $1,163 | $4,403 |
| 20 | $18,799 | $4,440 | $14,359 |
| 30 | $48,055 | $12,717 | $35,338 |
- 3.50%BDRY
- 0.65%CMDT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds
BDRY 13th cheapest of 13 funds
BDRY vs CMDT Dividends
- BDRY
- CMDT 12.09%
- BDRY None
- CMDT $3.83
- BDRY
- CMDT $3.20
- BDRY
- CMDT Oct 1, 2026
- BDRY
- CMDT Oct 5, 2026
- BDRY
- CMDT Quarterly
Distribution history
BDRY vs CMDT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BDRY 70.6%CMDT 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BDRY 0.64CMDT 0.83, better
- Worst fall
- BDRY −85.2%CMDT −13.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BDRY 2.59CMDT 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 3.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.50% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.50% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.62%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.