Skip to content

CMDT vs WEAT

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

Teucrium Wheat Fund

WEATBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

WEAT −0.03pt a year

CMDT0.65%WEAT0.62%

Avg volume · 30D

WEAT 8.2×the volume

CMDT65.9KWEAT538K

3Y return · a year

CMDT +22.0pt

CMDT+14.2%WEAT−7.8%

CMDT vs WEAT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.0%CMDT+4.7%WEAT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CMDT +28.0%. WEAT +4.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CMDT 0.65%
WEAT 0.62%, better
Fund size
CMDT $890M
WEAT $234M
1Y total return
CMDT +28.0%, better
WEAT +4.7%
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%
WEAT No data
Holdings
CMDT 357
WEAT 31
Avg volume (30D)
CMDT 65.9K sh
WEAT 538K sh, better
NAV per share
CMDT $31.84
WEAT $22.21
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72. WEAT: Cost 76, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 61.
Pillar letters and Scores for CMDT, WEAT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCMDTWEAT
Cost30% weightB61A76Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherD26
Tradability15% weightC51A84Higher
Holdings10% weightA70Not scored
Durability5% weightA72HigherB61

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CMDT and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

WEAT ranks 2nd and CMDT 4th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

WEATBTeucrium Wheat Fund

In short

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.

Stated mandate

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.

Why people hold it

  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.
  • WEAT Costs 0.62% a year, under the typical fee for futures-based commodity funds. Cheap matters most when the thing you own throws off no income.
  • The benchmark splits across three CBOT contracts: 35% second-to-expire, 30% third-to-expire, 35% the following December. Roll risk gets spread down the curve, not stacked on one month.teucrium.com
  • Wheat exposure without a futures account: no margin posting, no roll management, no contract expiries on your calendar. Buy it like a stock, sell it like a stock.teucrium.com
  • Among futures-based commodity funds, one of the stronger overall packages on cost and structure.

Worth knowing

  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.
  • WEAT It is a commodity pool taxed as a partnership, so shareholders get a Schedule K-1 with Section 1256 treatment (60% long-term, 40% short-term), not a 1099.teucrium.com
  • The fund tracks wheat futures, not the spot price. When the curve slopes against you, returns can drift from the wheat headlines you read.teucrium.com
  • One crop, one market, and weather sets the price. Swings here run hot compared with diversified commodity baskets, and the fund is built for price exposure, not income.

Full CMDT profile⁠

Full WEAT profile⁠

CMDT vs WEAT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CMDT vs WEAT Cost

Overpaying CMDT vs WEAT

$538

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

  • WEAT 0.62%

    $12,179

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CMDT 0.65%
  • WEAT 0.62%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CMDT $12,717WEAT $12,179

Year by year

YearCMDTWEATOverpaying
10$1,163$1,111$52
20$4,440$4,246$194
30$12,717$12,179$538

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CMDT
  • 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT vs WEAT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%
WEAT No data
Payout (12M)
CMDT $3.83
WEAT None
Last payment
CMDT $3.20
WEAT No data
Ex-dividend
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
WEAT No data
Paid on
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
WEAT No data
Frequency
CMDT Quarterly
WEAT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
WEATAll WEAT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CMDT vs WEAT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CMDT 11.5%, betterWEAT 22.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CMDT 0.83, betterWEAT −0.46
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CMDT −13.2%since May 2023WEAT −67.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CMDT 0.78WEAT 0.68

CMDT and WEAT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsSOYBB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsSOYBB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · Teucrium Soybean Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.63%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsUSGB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WEATBvsUSGB

    Teucrium Wheat Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.62% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.