WEAT ranks 2nd and CMDT 4th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
CMDT vs WEAT
WEAT −0.03pt a year
0.65%0.62%
WEAT 8.2×the volume
65.9K538K
CMDT +22.0pt
+14.2%−7.8%
CMDT vs WEAT Performance
+28.0%+4.7%
- CMDT 0.65%
- WEAT 0.62%, better
- CMDT $890M
- WEAT $234M
- CMDT +28.0%, better
- WEAT +4.7%
- CMDT 12.09%
- WEAT
- CMDT 357
- WEAT 31
- CMDT 65.9K sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- CMDT $31.84
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CMDT | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B61 | A76Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A81Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | C51 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | A70 | |
| Durability | A72Higher | B61 |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. CMDT and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CMDTB
WEATB
In short
CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CMDT vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CMDT vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying CMDT vs WEAT
$538
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CMDT 0.65%
$12,717
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CMDT | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $1,111 | $52 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $4,246 | $194 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $12,179 | $538 |
- 0.65%CMDT
- 0.62%WEAT, cheaper
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds
CMDT vs WEAT Dividends
- CMDT 12.09%
- WEAT
- CMDT $3.83
- WEAT None
- CMDT $3.20
- WEAT
- CMDT Oct 1, 2026
- WEAT
- CMDT Oct 5, 2026
- WEAT
- CMDT Quarterly
- WEAT
Distribution history
CMDT vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CMDT 11.5%, betterWEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CMDT 0.83, betterWEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- CMDT −13.2%WEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CMDT 0.78WEAT 0.68
CMDT and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


