Skip to content

CMDT vs SOYB

PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

CMDTBNYSE Arca

Teucrium Soybean Fund

SOYBBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SOYB −0.02pt a year

CMDT0.65%SOYB0.63%

Avg volume · 30D

SOYB 1.05×the volume

CMDT65.9KSOYB68.9K

3Y return · a year

CMDT +15.8pt

CMDT+14.2%SOYB−1.6%

CMDT vs SOYB Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+28.0%CMDT+13.0%SOYB

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CMDT +28.0%. SOYB +13.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CMDT 0.65%
SOYB 0.63%, better
Fund size
CMDT $890M
SOYB $39M
1Y total return
CMDT +28.0%, better
SOYB +13.0%
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%
SOYB No data
Holdings
CMDT 357
SOYB 12
Avg volume (30D)
CMDT 65.9K sh
SOYB 68.9K sh, better
NAV per share
CMDT $31.84
SOYB $26.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CMDT: Cost 61, Risk 81, Mission not scored, Tradability 51, Holdings 70, Durability 72. SOYB: Cost 69, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 76, Holdings not scored, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for CMDT, SOYB, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCMDTSOYB
Cost30% weightB61B69Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA81HigherB56
Tradability15% weightC51A76Higher
Holdings10% weightA70Not scored
Durability5% weightA72HigherC49

Rank among Commodity Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CMDT and SOYB are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Commodity Futures⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

SOYB ranks 2nd and CMDT 4th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1APDBCInvesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2BSOYBTeucrium Soybean FundScore 65
  3. Rank 2BWEATTeucrium Wheat FundScore 65
  4. Rank 4BCMDTPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded FundScore 64
  5. Rank 5BUSGUSCF Gold Strategy Plus Income FundScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CMDTBPIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund

SOYBBTeucrium Soybean Fund

In short

CMDT PIMCO took the standard commodity futures fund and added the thing it is known for: an actively managed bond portfolio sitting behind the commodity bets. The mandate is to beat the Bloomberg Commodity Index, not mirror it.

SOYB Soybeans, straight up. Since 2011 SOYB has tracked a benchmark of soybean futures for future delivery, wrapped so you can buy the bean in an ordinary brokerage account, and it charges less than the typical commodity futures fund.

Stated mandate

CMDT The fund aims to achieve a total return that outperforms the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, while maintaining prudent investment management.

SOYB SOYB seeks to track daily changes in the soybean market for future delivery through its benchmark.

Why people hold it

  • CMDT Active by design. The stated objective is to outperform the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return, not replicate it.
  • Two engines in one ticker: swaps, futures and commodity-linked notes for the commodity exposure, an actively managed fixed income portfolio as the collateral behind them.
  • A 1940 Act fund that routes commodity-linked exposure through a Cayman subsidiary, so holders get a 1099 rather than a partnership K-1.
  • Global commodity reach spread across roughly 300 positions, with cash distributed quarterly.
  • SOYB Fee of 0.63% a year sits under the 0.81% median for commodity futures funds, and under diversified rival PDBC at 0.74%.
  • A single-crop play, not a commodity grab bag: the fund follows the Teucrium Soybean Index, which tracks daily moves in soybean futures.
  • Trading since 2011, a long run for a one-commodity fund, and one of the stronger implementations in its commodity futures peer group.

Worth knowing

  • CMDT At 0.98% a year, it sits above cheaper index-based options in the commodity futures group such as PDBC (0.74%) and HARD (0.78%). Active management is what the premium buys.
  • Tracking is not the goal here. Manager calls can push results away from the Bloomberg Commodity Index in either direction.
  • The bond collateral sleeve brings interest rate and credit sensitivity that a plain futures-and-Treasuries commodity fund does not carry.
  • SOYB One crop, one price. Weather, harvest cycles and export demand move soybean futures hard, and there is nothing else in the portfolio to soften it.
  • It is a commodity pool, not a standard 1940 Act fund, so the tax paperwork differs from a stock ETF. Check how that lands on your return.
  • Mid-sized asset base and moderate turnover mean bid-ask spreads can run wider than on the giant index funds, and the payoff comes from price moves, not income.

Full CMDT profile⁠

Full SOYB profile⁠

CMDT vs SOYB Holdings

How CMDT and SOYB differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CMDT and 0.0% of SOYB.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile89.3%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for SOYB.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in CMDT and SOYB, widest gap first
CountryMore in CMDTMore in SOYB
United StatesSOYB +10.7 points
CanadaCMDT +10.7 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CMDT28.3%
  • SOYB95.1%

Securities held

  • CMDT323
  • SOYB8

Asset class

CMDT
Commodities
SOYB
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in CMDT323
  • In both0
  • Only in SOYB8

Only in CMDT

323 securities, 88.6% of CMDT by weight

  • Pimco Enhanced Short Maturity Pimco Enhanced Short Maturit5.22%
  • Vistra Operations Co Llc Company Guar 144A 01/27 3.7 3.70% 01/30/20271.57%
  • Cpde Invt Co Llc 4.36% 01/08/20271.47%

Only in SOYB

8 securities, 48.3% of SOYB by weight

  • Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund 12/31/203120.34%
  • Admacm 09/01/20997.80%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20374.21%

Weight gaps

CMDT and SOYB share no securities.

All 303 CMDT holdings⁠All 32 SOYB holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CMDT vs SOYB Cost

Overpaying CMDT vs SOYB

$358

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CMDT 0.65%

    $12,717

  • SOYB 0.63%

    $12,359

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CMDT 0.65%
  • SOYB 0.63%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530CMDT $12,717SOYB $12,359

Year by year

YearCMDTSOYBOverpaying
10$1,163$1,128$35
20$4,440$4,311$129
30$12,717$12,359$358

Expense ratio

  • 0.65%CMDT
  • 0.63%SOYB, cheaper
  • Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
  • Median 0.79%

SOYB 5th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT 6th cheapest of 13 funds

CMDT vs SOYB Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CMDT 12.09%
SOYB No data
Payout (12M)
CMDT $3.83
SOYB None
Last payment
CMDT $3.20
SOYB No data
Ex-dividend
CMDT Oct 1, 2026
SOYB No data
Paid on
CMDT Oct 5, 2026
SOYB No data
Frequency
CMDT Quarterly
SOYB No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

CMDTQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll CMDT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Jul 3, 2023 $0.03; Oct 2, 2023 $0.32; Dec 11, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.31; Apr 1, 2024 $0.27; Jul 1, 2024 $0.26; Oct 1, 2024 $0.76; Dec 31, 2024 $0.93; Apr 1, 2025 $0.20; Jul 1, 2025 $0.21; Oct 1, 2025 $0.21; Dec 31, 2025 $0.22; Apr 1, 2026 $0.19; Jul 1, 2026 $0.22; Oct 1, 2026 $3.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5020232026YTD
SOYBAll SOYB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CMDT vs SOYB Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CMDT 11.5%, betterSOYB 15.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CMDT 0.83, betterSOYB −0.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CMDT −13.2%since May 2023SOYB −31.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CMDT 0.78SOYB 0.44

CMDT and SOYB in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CMDTBvsPDBCA

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsPDBCA

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsWEATB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsWEATB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · Teucrium Wheat Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.62%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CMDTBvsUSGB

    PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SOYBBvsUSGB

    Teucrium Soybean Fund · USCF Gold Strategy Plus Income Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.63% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.