Skip to content

BFEB vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

BFEBCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BFEB0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BFEB 10.5×the volume

BFEB17.2KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

BFEB +2.3pt

BFEB+11.2%XTR+8.9%

BFEB vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+70.1%BFEB+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BFEB +70.1%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BFEB 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BFEB $204M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BFEB +12.4%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
BFEB No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
BFEB 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BFEB 17.2K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BFEB $53.79
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BFEB: Cost 40, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BFEB, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBFEBXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA79HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightA74HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BFEB and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BFEB ranks 30th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 27CSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 55
  2. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  3. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BFEBCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BFEB The February slot in Innovator's buffer lineup: FLEX options on SPY that absorb the first 9% of a decline over an approximately annual outcome period, in exchange for a ceiling on the upside that resets every February.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BFEB The Fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during an approximately annual outcome period. It uses FLEX Options and may invest directly in the underlying ETF or its components.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BFEB Absorbs the first 9% of SPY's losses (before fees) over an approximately annual outcome period, using FLEX options inside an ordinary 1940 Act fund rather than a bank note.innovatoretfs.com
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for shallow-buffer SPY funds. You pay the going rate for the structure, not a premium for the calendar month.
  • Terms reset on their own each February 1, so there is no options roll to manage and no maturity date to diarize.innovatoretfs.com
  • One of a monthly family running the same SPY buffer recipe (BJAN, BMAY, BJUL and others), so the start date isn't locked to a single point on the calendar.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BFEB The cap is what pays for the buffer. Upside stops at a level set each February, and anything SPY earns above it is left on the table.
  • Headline terms apply to holders across a full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap are left, not the stated 9%.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades thinly next to the largest buffer funds, which tends to mean wider bid-ask spreads on the way in and out.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BFEB profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BFEB vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BFEB vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BFEB vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BFEB 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BFEB 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BFEB $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBFEBXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BFEB
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BFEB 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BFEB vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BFEB No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
BFEB None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BFEB No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BFEB No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BFEB No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BFEB No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BFEBAll BFEB payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

BFEB vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BFEB
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BFEB 8.2%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BFEB 1.53, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BFEB −14.8%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BFEB 0.67XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • BFEBCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFEBCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BFEBCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.