ILCV ranks 2nd and BFOR 56th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
BFOR vs ILCV
ILCV −0.61pt a year
0.65%0.04%
BFOR 1.4×the volume
35.3K24.4K
BFOR +0.3pt
+12.6%+12.3%
BFOR vs ILCV Performance
+57.3%+81.1%
- BFOR 0.65%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- BFOR $241M
- ILCV $1.37B
- BFOR +18.0%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- BFOR 0.52%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- BFOR 401
- ILCV 375
- BFOR 35.3K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- BFOR $23.42
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFOR | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A82 |
| Risk | C48 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D39 |
| Durability | C48 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. BFOR and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFORC
ILCVA
In short
BFOR A famous stock list turned into a fund. BFOR follows the Barron's 400 Index, a rules-based screen for growth at a reasonable price plus quality in US stocks, and it has run that playbook since 2013.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
BFOR The fund seeks to track the performance of the Barron's 400 Index before fees and expenses.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFOR vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFOR vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying BFOR vs ILCV
$11,868
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFOR 0.65%
$12,717
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFOR | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $73 | $1,090 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $288 | $4,152 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $849 | $11,868 |
- 0.65%BFOR
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
BFOR 91st cheapest of 99 funds
BFOR vs ILCV Dividends
- BFOR 0.52%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- BFOR $0.12
- ILCV $1.65
- BFOR $0.12
- ILCV $0.42
- BFOR Dec 18, 2025
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- BFOR Dec 23, 2025
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- BFOR Annual
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
BFOR vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BFOR
- ILCV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFOR 14.8%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BFOR 1.09ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- BFOR −25.9%ILCV −18.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BFOR 1.03ILCV 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.