XDSQ ranks 3rd and BFXU 10th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.
BFXU vs XDSQ
XDSQ −0.16pt a year
0.95%0.79%
XDSQ 39.0×the volume
35613.9K
BFXU vs XDSQ Performance
+0.7%+2.5%
- BFXU 0.95%
- XDSQ 0.79%, better
- BFXU $2M
- XDSQ $69M
- BFXU
- XDSQ +9.3%
- BFXU 5
- XDSQ 4
- BFXU 356 sh
- XDSQ 13.9K sh, better
- BFXU $23.29
- XDSQ $44.41
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BFXU | XDSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F3 | B63Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C41 | A78Higher |
| Holdings | A70Higher | B57 |
| Durability | F23 | A80Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds
Same Category. BFXU and XDSQ are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BFXUD
XDSQB
In short
XDSQ Twice the upside of its S&P 500 reference fund up to a cap, with roughly the full downside. XDSQ runs that trade on a three-month clock, so the cap resets four times a year instead of once.
Stated mandate
XDSQ The fund seeks to deliver twice the upside performance of SPY, subject to a cap, while approximately matching SPY's downside over a quarterly outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BFXU vs XDSQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BFXU vs XDSQ Cost
Overpaying BFXU vs XDSQ
$2,695
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BFXU 0.95%
$17,869
XDSQ 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BFXU | XDSQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,405 | $273 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $5,331 | $991 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $15,174 | $2,695 |
- 0.95%BFXU
- 0.79%XDSQ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
XDSQ 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
BFXU 12th cheapest of 12 funds
BFXU vs XDSQ Dividends
- BFXU None
- XDSQ None
Distribution history
BFXU vs XDSQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BFXU XDSQ 10.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BFXU XDSQ 1.22
- Worst fall
- BFXU XDSQ −26.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BFXU 1.15XDSQ 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.