XDSQ ranks 3rd and XTJA 4th of 12 funds in the S&P 500 Accelerated Category.
XDSQ vs XTJA
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.79%0.79%
XDSQ 5.1×the volume
13.9K2.7K
XDSQ +2.6pt
+17.9%+15.3%
XDSQ vs XTJA Performance
+9.3%+13.4%
- XDSQ 0.79%
- XTJA 0.79%
- XDSQ $69M
- XTJA $17M
- XDSQ +9.3%
- XTJA +13.4%, better
- XDSQ 4
- XTJA 3
- XDSQ 13.9K sh, better
- XTJA 2.7K sh
- XDSQ $44.41
- XTJA $35.28
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | XDSQ | XTJA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | B63 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | C53Higher |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A80Higher | C53 |
Rank among S&P 500 Accelerated funds
Same Category. XDSQ and XTJA are both graded against the same 12 S&P 500 Accelerated funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
XDSQB
XTJAB
In short
XDSQ Twice the upside of its S&P 500 reference fund up to a cap, with roughly the full downside. XDSQ runs that trade on a three-month clock, so the cap resets four times a year instead of once.
Stated mandate
XDSQ The fund seeks to deliver twice the upside performance of SPY, subject to a cap, while approximately matching SPY's downside over a quarterly outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
XDSQ vs XTJA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
XDSQ vs XTJA Cost
Same expense ratio
$15,174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
XDSQ 0.79%
$15,174
XTJA 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | XDSQ | XTJA |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,405 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,331 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $15,174 |
- 0.79%XDSQ
- 0.79%XTJA
- Middle half of S&P 500 Accelerated funds
- Median 0.79%
XDSQ 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
XTJA 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
XDSQ vs XTJA Dividends
- XDSQ None
- XTJA None
Distribution history
XDSQ vs XTJA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- XDSQ 10.4%XTJA 8.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- XDSQ 1.22XTJA 1.26, better
- Worst fall
- XDSQ −26.1%XTJA −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- XDSQ 0.82XTJA 0.57
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.79%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.