BGIG ranks 3rd and RFDA 17th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
BGIG vs RFDA
BGIG −0.07pt a year
0.45%0.52%
BGIG 47.3×the volume
171K3.62K
RFDA +2.9pt
+19.6%+22.5%
BGIG vs RFDA Performance
+18.6%+17.6%
- BGIG 0.45%, better
- RFDA 0.52%
- BGIG $2.29B
- RFDA $79M
- BGIG +18.6%, better
- RFDA +17.6%
- BGIG 1.67%
- RFDA 1.98%, better
- BGIG 50
- RFDA 77
- BGIG 171K sh, better
- RFDA 3.62K sh
- BGIG $37.45
- RFDA $73.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BGIG | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73Higher | C44 |
| Mission | C40 | B61Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C53 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. BGIG and RFDA are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BGIGA
RFDAC
In short
BGIG An active dividend fund that writes the cushion into its own mandate: rising income, downside protection versus the broad market, and growth. Distributions land monthly, and it charges less than the typical active dividend-income fund.
RFDA A 2016-vintage active dividend fund that doesn't screen on yield alone: RFDA ranks US payers on growth, momentum, quality and value at once, then sends income out monthly instead of quarterly.
Stated mandate
BGIG The Fund seeks growing dividend income, downside protection relative to the broader equity market, and long-term capital appreciation.
RFDA RFDA seeks capital appreciation and dividend income through a disciplined US dividend-growth strategy using quality screens and active factor-driven selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BGIG vs RFDA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BGIG vs RFDA Cost
Overpaying RFDA vs BGIG
$1,310
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BGIG 0.45%
$9,041
RFDA 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BGIG | RFDA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $935 | $123 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $3,593 | $465 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $10,351 | $1,310 |
- 0.45%BGIG, cheaper
- 0.52%RFDA
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
BGIG 9th cheapest of 40 funds
RFDA 23rd cheapest of 40 funds
BGIG vs RFDA Dividends
- BGIG 1.67%
- RFDA 1.98%, better
- BGIG $0.62
- RFDA $1.45
- BGIG $0.05
- RFDA $0.07
- BGIG Oct 29, 2026
- RFDA Oct 22, 2026
- BGIG Pays Nov 2, 2026
- RFDA Oct 27, 2026
- BGIG Monthly
- RFDA Monthly
Distribution history
BGIG vs RFDA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BGIG 9.5%, betterRFDA 11.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BGIG 1.49, betterRFDA 1.45
- Worst fall
- BGIG −13.2%RFDA −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BGIG 0.55RFDA 0.85
BGIG and RFDA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

