CGDV ranks 1st and RFDA 17th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
CGDV vs RFDA
CGDV −0.19pt a year
0.33%0.52%
CGDV 940.2×the volume
3.4M3.62K
CGDV +2.7pt
+25.2%+22.5%
CGDV vs RFDA Performance
+15.9%+17.6%
- CGDV 0.33%, better
- RFDA 0.52%
- CGDV $40.2B
- RFDA $79M
- CGDV +15.9%
- RFDA +17.6%, better
- CGDV 1.23%
- RFDA 1.98%, better
- CGDV 57
- RFDA 77
- CGDV 3.4M sh, better
- RFDA 3.62K sh
- CGDV $48.81
- RFDA $73.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CGDV | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A87Higher | B61 |
| Risk | C46Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C47 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A95Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. CGDV and RFDA are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CGDVA
RFDAC
In short
CGDV A stock picker's dividend fund at near-index pricing: 0.33% a year, roughly 60 names, and a mandate for above-average yield plus growth. Live since 2022 and already grown into a multi-billion-dollar fund.
RFDA A 2016-vintage active dividend fund that doesn't screen on yield alone: RFDA ranks US payers on growth, momentum, quality and value at once, then sends income out monthly instead of quarterly.
Stated mandate
CGDV The fund seeks income above the average yield of U.S. stocks while also offering capital-growth potential.
RFDA RFDA seeks capital appreciation and dividend income through a disciplined US dividend-growth strategy using quality screens and active factor-driven selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CGDV vs RFDA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CGDV vs RFDA Cost
Overpaying RFDA vs CGDV
$3,614
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CGDV 0.33%
$6,737
RFDA 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CGDV | RFDA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $598 | $935 | $337 |
| 20 | $2,318 | $3,593 | $1,275 |
| 30 | $6,737 | $10,351 | $3,614 |
- 0.33%CGDV, cheaper
- 0.52%RFDA
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
CGDV 2nd cheapest of 40 funds
RFDA 23rd cheapest of 40 funds
CGDV vs RFDA Dividends
- CGDV 1.23%
- RFDA 1.98%, better
- CGDV $0.60
- RFDA $1.45
- CGDV $0.15
- RFDA $0.07
- CGDV Sep 30, 2026
- RFDA Oct 22, 2026
- CGDV Oct 1, 2026
- RFDA Oct 27, 2026
- CGDV Quarterly
- RFDA Monthly
Distribution history
CGDV vs RFDA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CGDV 11.9%RFDA 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CGDV 1.59, betterRFDA 1.45
- Worst fall
- CGDV −21.8%RFDA −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- CGDV 0.90RFDA 0.85
CGDV and RFDA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.33% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

