HIDV ranks 2nd and RFDA 17th of 40 funds in the US Active Dividend Income Category.
HIDV vs RFDA
HIDV −0.17pt a year
0.35%0.52%
HIDV 2.0×the volume
7.06K3.62K
HIDV +0.6pt
+23.1%+22.5%
HIDV vs RFDA Performance
+15.7%+17.6%
- HIDV 0.35%, better
- RFDA 0.52%
- HIDV $207M
- RFDA $79M
- HIDV +15.7%
- RFDA +17.6%, better
- HIDV 2.54%, better
- RFDA 1.98%
- HIDV 109
- RFDA 77
- HIDV 7.06K sh, better
- RFDA 3.62K sh
- HIDV $89.59
- RFDA $73.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | HIDV | RFDA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C44 |
| Mission | A80Higher | B61 |
| Risk | D31 | D38Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | B69 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A79Higher | A78 |
Rank among US Active Dividend Income funds
Same Category. HIDV and RFDA are both graded against the same 40 US Active Dividend Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
HIDVA
RFDAC
In short
HIDV HIDV hunts dividends without wandering off the map: an active, systematic screen on value, quality and momentum, wrapped around S&P 500-like market participation. Income tilt, core-equity shape.
RFDA A 2016-vintage active dividend fund that doesn't screen on yield alone: RFDA ranks US payers on growth, momentum, quality and value at once, then sends income out monthly instead of quarterly.
Stated mandate
HIDV HIDV is an active U.S. equity ETF seeking core U.S. equity exposure, attractive dividend income, and capital appreciation. Its systematic process is designed to identify dividend opportunities while maintaining diversified, market-like participation.
RFDA RFDA seeks capital appreciation and dividend income through a disciplined US dividend-growth strategy using quality screens and active factor-driven selection.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
HIDV vs RFDA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
HIDV vs RFDA Cost
Overpaying RFDA vs HIDV
$3,225
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
HIDV 0.35%
$7,126
RFDA 0.52%
$10,351
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | HIDV | RFDA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $935 | $301 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $3,593 | $1,139 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $10,351 | $3,225 |
- 0.35%HIDV, cheaper
- 0.52%RFDA
- Middle half of US Active Dividend Income funds
- Median 0.50%
HIDV 4th cheapest of 40 funds
RFDA 23rd cheapest of 40 funds
HIDV vs RFDA Dividends
- HIDV 2.54%, better
- RFDA 1.98%
- HIDV $2.28
- RFDA $1.45
- HIDV $0.67
- RFDA $0.07
- HIDV Sep 18, 2026
- RFDA Oct 22, 2026
- HIDV Sep 21, 2026
- RFDA Oct 27, 2026
- HIDV Quarterly
- RFDA Monthly
Distribution history
HIDV vs RFDA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- HIDV 12.1%RFDA 11.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- HIDV 1.43RFDA 1.45, better
- Worst fall
- HIDV −18.8%RFDA −19.4%
- Market sensitivity
- HIDV 0.98RFDA 0.85
HIDV and RFDA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.52% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
