XLII ranks 3rd and BIOY 21st of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
BIOY vs XLII
XLII −14.63pt a year
14.98%0.35%
XLII 6.6×the volume
2.54K16.8K
BIOY vs XLII Performance
+5.9%−5.9%
- BIOY 14.98%
- XLII 0.35%, better
- BIOY $2M
- XLII $17M
- BIOY
- XLII +10.9%
- BIOY
- XLII 13.60%
- BIOY 7
- XLII 2
- BIOY 2.54K sh
- XLII 16.8K sh, better
- BIOY $18.92
- XLII $23.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIOY | XLII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B60Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | F24 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C49 | |
| Durability | D27 | C51Higher |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. BIOY and XLII are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BIOYF
XLIIA
In short
BIOY Most sector income funds sell calls on the sector itself. BIOY goes one level up: it sells puts on a 3x leveraged biotech ETF, mining the fat premiums that come with one of the market's twitchiest wrappers, and pays cash out weekly.
XLII Covered calls swarm tech; far rarer on machinery, railroads and defense primes. XLII owns the 1998-vintage industrials SPDR and sells short-dated calls on that fund itself, paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
BIOY The Fund seeks to generate three times the income from selling options on the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index through options on leveraged ETFs, while also seeking exposure to the leveraged ETF’s performance subject to a cap.
XLII The fund is actively managed to pursue current income while retaining the potential for long-term capital growth. It invests in XLI and sells call options on XLI to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIOY vs XLII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIOY vs XLII Cost
Overpaying BIOY vs XLII
$68,172
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIOY 14.98%
$75,298
XLII 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIOY | XLII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $15,318 | $634 | $14,684 |
| 20 | $36,802 | $2,454 | $34,348 |
| 30 | $75,298 | $7,126 | $68,172 |
- 14.98%BIOY
- 0.35%XLII, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLII cheapest of 22 funds
BIOY 22nd cheapest of 22 funds
BIOY vs XLII Dividends
- BIOY
- XLII 13.60%
- BIOY
- XLII $3.26
- BIOY $0.22
- XLII $0.30
- BIOY Nov 6, 2026
- XLII Nov 2, 2026
- BIOY Pays Nov 10, 2026
- XLII Nov 4, 2026
- BIOY Weekly
- XLII Monthly
Distribution history
BIOY vs XLII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIOY XLII 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BIOY XLII 0.60
- Worst fall
- BIOY XLII −10.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BIOY 0.56XLII 0.53
Popular comparisons
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.