XLSI ranks 1st and BIOY 21st of 22 funds in the Sector Option Income Category.
BIOY vs XLSI
0.0%by weight
XLSI −14.63pt a year
14.98%0.35%
XLSI 8.1×the volume
2.54K20.5K
BIOY vs XLSI Performance
+5.9%+4.9%
- BIOY 14.98%
- XLSI 0.35%, better
- BIOY $2M
- XLSI $26M
- BIOY
- XLSI +14.9%
- BIOY
- XLSI 12.23%
- BIOY 7
- XLSI 2
- BIOY 2.54K sh
- XLSI 20.5K sh, better
- BIOY $18.92
- XLSI $23.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BIOY | XLSI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A76Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | B60 | A73Higher |
| Tradability | F24 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C41 | |
| Durability | D27 | B61Higher |
Rank among Sector Option Income funds
Same Category. BIOY and XLSI are both graded against the same 22 Sector Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BIOYF
XLSIA
In short
BIOY Most sector income funds sell calls on the sector itself. BIOY goes one level up: it sells puts on a 3x leveraged biotech ETF, mining the fat premiums that come with one of the market's twitchiest wrappers, and pays cash out weekly.
XLSI Covered calls on the market's quietest aisle. XLSI owns the classic consumer staples sector fund and sells calls on it, turning soup, soap and razors into monthly income while giving up gains above the strike.
Stated mandate
BIOY The Fund seeks to generate three times the income from selling options on the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index through options on leveraged ETFs, while also seeking exposure to the leveraged ETF’s performance subject to a cap.
XLSI The fund uses an actively managed strategy intended to provide current income while preserving prospects for long-term capital growth. It invests in the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF and sells call options on that ETF to generate additional income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BIOY vs XLSI Holdings
How BIOY and XLSI differ
0.0%
About this figure: BIOY earns income from options, which aren’t counted.
XLSI earns income from options, which aren’t counted.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BIOY.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BIOYMore in XLSI | Gap | BIOY | XLSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- BIOY105.5%
- XLSI103.1%
- BIOY6
- XLSI1
Asset class
- BIOY
- Alternatives
- XLSI
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in BIOY6
- In both0
- Only in XLSI1
Only in BIOY
6 securities, 43.8% of BIOY by weight
- US TBill 04/22/202734.59%
- US TBill 02/04/20275.82%
- 2LABU 11/11/2026 P234.572.09%
- 2LABU 11/09/2026 P205.540.76%
- 2LABU 11/13/2026 P201.380.39%
- 2LABU 11/11/2026 P187.760.12%
Only in XLSI
1 security, 100% of XLSI by weight
- State Street Consumer Staples103.07%
Weight gaps
BIOY and XLSI share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BIOY vs XLSI Cost
Overpaying BIOY vs XLSI
$68,172
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BIOY 14.98%
$75,298
XLSI 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BIOY | XLSI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $15,318 | $634 | $14,684 |
| 20 | $36,802 | $2,454 | $34,348 |
| 30 | $75,298 | $7,126 | $68,172 |
- 14.98%BIOY
- 0.35%XLSI, cheaper
- Middle half of Sector Option Income funds
- Median 0.47%
XLSI cheapest of 22 funds
BIOY 22nd cheapest of 22 funds
BIOY vs XLSI Dividends
- BIOY
- XLSI 12.23%
- BIOY
- XLSI $2.92
- BIOY $0.22
- XLSI $0.22
- BIOY Nov 6, 2026
- XLSI Nov 2, 2026
- BIOY Pays Nov 10, 2026
- XLSI Nov 4, 2026
- BIOY Weekly
- XLSI Monthly
Distribution history
BIOY vs XLSI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BIOY XLSI 12.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- BIOY XLSI 0.48
- Worst fall
- BIOY XLSI −7.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BIOY 0.56XLSI 0.19
Popular comparisons
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 14.98% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.