BITX ranks 4th and TXXH 9th of 14 funds in the 2x Long Crypto Category.
BITX vs TXXH
0.0%by weight
TXXH −0.86pt a year
2.75%1.89%
BITX 697.2×the volume
9.85M14.1K
BITX vs TXXH Performance
+39.3%+127.2%
- BITX 2.75%
- TXXH 1.89%, better
- BITX $1.03B
- TXXH $6M
- BITX −64.7%
- TXXH
- BITX 9.31%
- TXXH
- BITX 3
- TXXH 2
- BITX 9.85M sh, better
- TXXH 14.1K sh
- BITX $16.19
- TXXH $73.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BITX | TXXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | C53Higher |
| Mission | F0 | |
| Risk | B65 | A80Higher |
| Tradability | A99Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A77Higher | F20 |
Rank among 2x Long Crypto funds
Same Category. BITX and TXXH are both graded against the same 14 2x Long Crypto funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BITXB
TXXHC
In short
BITX One of the original 2x bitcoin funds, live since 2023. BITX aims for twice the daily move of a bitcoin futures index, resets that math every day, and trades heavily. High-octane, priced like it, and built for days rather than decades.
TXXH The first US-listed leveraged bet on Hyperliquid's HYPE token. TXXH is a 1940-Act fund that uses swaps and futures to chase twice HYPE's daily move: a trading tool in a brokerage-friendly wrapper.
Stated mandate
BITX The Fund seeks daily results equal to twice the daily performance of the S&P CME Bitcoin Futures Daily Roll Index, before fees and expenses.
TXXH The Fund seeks twice the daily price performance of HYPE before fees and expenses. It is designed for daily, short-term leveraged exposure rather than results over periods longer than one day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BITX vs TXXH Holdings
How BITX and TXXH differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BITX and 0.0% of TXXH.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BITX and TXXH.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for BITX and TXXH.
Concentration
- BITX100.0%
- TXXH207.7%
- BITX0
- TXXH1
Asset class
- BITX
- Alternatives
- TXXH
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in BITX0
- In both0
- Only in TXXH1
Only in BITX
0 securities, 0.0% of BITX by weight
Only in TXXH
1 security, 8.1% of TXXH by weight
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20378.07%
Weight gaps
BITX and TXXH share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BITX vs TXXH Cost
Overpaying BITX vs TXXH
$9,742
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BITX 2.75%
$41,266
TXXH 1.89%
$31,524
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BITX | TXXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,509 | $3,211 | $1,298 |
| 20 | $15,708 | $11,602 | $4,106 |
| 30 | $41,266 | $31,524 | $9,742 |
- 2.75%BITX
- 1.89%TXXH, cheaper
- Middle half of 2x Long Crypto funds
- Median 2.02%
TXXH 7th cheapest of 14 funds
BITX 9th cheapest of 14 funds
BITX vs TXXH Dividends
- BITX 9.31%
- TXXH
- BITX $1.51
- TXXH None
- BITX $0.02
- TXXH
- BITX Oct 21, 2026
- TXXH
- BITX Oct 22, 2026
- TXXH
- BITX Monthly
- TXXH
Distribution history
BITX vs TXXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BITX 106.3%TXXH
- Return per unit of risk
- BITX 0.49TXXH
- Worst fall
- BITX −83.4%TXXH
- Market sensitivity
- BITX 3.22TXXH 6.89
BITX and TXXH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 2.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.75% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.89% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.75% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
