Skip to content

BJAN vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJANCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BJAN0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BJAN 1.2×the volume

BJAN17.9KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BJAN +2.9pt

BJAN+17.4%SIXJ+14.5%

BJAN vs SIXJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+12.9%BJAN+10.7%SIXJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BJAN +12.9%. SIXJ +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BJAN 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BJAN $338M
SIXJ $146M
1Y total return
BJAN +12.9%, better
SIXJ +10.7%
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
SIXJ No data
Holdings
BJAN 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BJAN 17.9K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
BJAN $59.06
SIXJ $36.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJAN: Cost 40, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 82, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJAN, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJANSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51A72Higher
Tradability15% weightA82HigherA72
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightA82HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJAN and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 2nd and BJAN 26th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 65
  5. Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56
  6. Rank 26CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  7. Rank 26BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJANCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BJAN A written-down deal instead of a forecast: BJAN absorbs the first 9% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every January, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. It has run that same playbook since 2019.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BJAN The Fund seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated upside cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the applicable outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BJAN The terms are spelled out in the prospectus, not implied: first 9% of reference losses absorbed, upside capped, one-year outcome period starting each January.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading since January 2019, so the January series has rolled through real market cycles rather than arriving on the back of a model.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for buffer funds built on the same reference, so you are paying the going rate for the structure.
  • Stands in the upper half of its buffer-fund peer group, with a long operating record doing the most to hold it there.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BJAN The cap is reset each January and set by option pricing at the time. Buy mid-period and you get the buffer and upside that remain, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades lightly next to the busiest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads. Limit orders do more work here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Cheaper routes to a similar trade exist in the same cohort: BUFB ladders buffers across months at 0.10%, ZALT runs a quarterly reset at 0.69%.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BJAN profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BJAN vs SIXJ Holdings

How BJAN and SIXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors97.8%
  • Asset classStocks100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BJAN and SIXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in BJANMore in SIXJGap
TechnologyBJAN +1.8 points
FinancialsSIXJ +0.6 points
Consumer DiscretionarySIXJ +0.5 points
CommunicationSIXJ +0.4 points
EnergyBJAN +0.4 points
Health CareSIXJ +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesSIXJ +0.2 points
Real EstateSIXJ +0.1 points
UtilitiesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BJAN and SIXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in BJANMore in SIXJGap
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BJAN100.8%
  • SIXJ101.1%

Securities held

  • BJAN3
  • SIXJ2

Asset class

BJAN
Stocks
SIXJ
Stocks

Holdings

  • Only in BJAN3
  • In both0
  • Only in SIXJ2

Only in BJAN

3 securities, 100% of BJAN by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 6.83 C99.30%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 681.93 P1.19%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.31%

Only in SIXJ

2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C97.42%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P3.35%

Weight gaps

BJAN and SIXJ share no securities.

All 6 BJAN holdings⁠All 5 SIXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJAN vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BJAN vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJAN 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJAN $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBJANSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJAN
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
SIXJ No data
Payout (12M)
BJAN None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BJAN1 paymentAll BJAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12019
SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BJAN vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJAN 8.6%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJAN 1.55SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJAN −17.4%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJAN 0.72SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BJANCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.