Skip to content

BJAN vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJANCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BJAN0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BJAN 10.9×the volume

BJAN17.9KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

BJAN +1.7pt

BJAN+10.2%XTR+8.5%

BJAN vs XTR Performance

Nov 9, 2021 – Nov 9, 2026

+62.6%BJAN+50.2%XTR

Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. BJAN +62.6%. XTR +50.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BJAN 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BJAN $338M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BJAN +12.9%, better
XTR +9.3%
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
XTR 16.52%, better
Holdings
BJAN 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BJAN 17.9K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BJAN $59.06
XTR $27.91
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJAN: Cost 40, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 82, Holdings not scored, Durability 82. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 26, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 89, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJAN, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJANXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51HigherD26
Tradability15% weightA82HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA89
Durability5% weightA82HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJAN and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BJAN ranks 26th and XTR 60th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 24BSIXFAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Feb/Aug ETFScore 56
  2. Rank 26CBJANInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  3. Rank 26BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 55
  4. Rank 60CPQVPGIM S&P 500 Quarterly Buffer 5 ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 60CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 65DDGJAFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - JanuaryScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJANCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BJAN A written-down deal instead of a forecast: BJAN absorbs the first 9% of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over a one-year outcome period that resets every January, and gives up upside above a cap in exchange. It has run that same playbook since 2019.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BJAN The Fund seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated upside cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the applicable outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BJAN The terms are spelled out in the prospectus, not implied: first 9% of reference losses absorbed, upside capped, one-year outcome period starting each January.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trading since January 2019, so the January series has rolled through real market cycles rather than arriving on the back of a model.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for buffer funds built on the same reference, so you are paying the going rate for the structure.
  • Stands in the upper half of its buffer-fund peer group, with a long operating record doing the most to hold it there.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BJAN The cap is reset each January and set by option pricing at the time. Buy mid-period and you get the buffer and upside that remain, not the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Trades lightly next to the busiest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads. Limit orders do more work here than in a mega-cap index fund.
  • Cheaper routes to a similar trade exist in the same cohort: BUFB ladders buffers across months at 0.10%, ZALT runs a quarterly reset at 0.69%.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BJAN profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BJAN vs XTR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJAN vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BJAN vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJAN 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJAN $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBJANXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJAN
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJAN vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
BJAN 0.00%
XTR 16.52%, better
Payout (12M)
BJAN None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BJAN No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BJAN No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BJAN No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BJAN No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

BJAN1 paymentAll BJAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Nov 19, 2019 $1.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD
XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD

BJAN vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BJAN
  • XTR
Nov 9, 2021 to Nov 9, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJAN 8.6%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJAN 1.55, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJAN −17.4%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJAN 0.72XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • BJANCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJANCvsSIXJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsSIXJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.