Skip to content

BJUL vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BJULBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BJUL0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BJUL 17.3×the volume

BJUL28.5KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

BJUL +2.0pt

BJUL+10.9%XTR+8.9%

BJUL vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+67.9%BJUL+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BJUL +67.9%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BJUL 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BJUL $357M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BJUL +9.8%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
BJUL No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
BJUL 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BJUL 28.5K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BJUL $55.16
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BJUL: Cost 40, Risk 42, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings not scored, Durability 83. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BJUL, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBJULXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC42HigherF18
Tradability15% weightA84HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightA83HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BJUL and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BJUL ranks 32nd and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53
  2. Rank 32BBJULInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 53
  3. Rank 34CBAPRInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BJULBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BJUL Running since 2018, BJUL keeps a July clock: it absorbs the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's losses over each 12-month outcome period, in exchange for a cap on the upside.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BJUL BJUL seeks to match the return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to an upside cap, while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the annual outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BJUL The deal in one line: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's decline is absorbed over the outcome period, and gains above a cap set at each July reset are given up.
  • Live since 2018, so it carries many completed annual resets rather than a single-cycle history, which is rare in a category mostly built after it.
  • Among dozens of shallow-buffer funds wrapped around the same S&P 500 ETF, this one lands in the upper half of the group on our review.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BJUL The 9% cushion and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you get whatever protection and upside room remain, not the headline terms.
  • At 0.79% a year it sits right at the buffer-fund median, and relatives like ZALT (0.69%) and the laddered BUFB (0.10%) run cheaper.
  • Volume is light, so spreads deserve a look before trading, and regular distributions are not part of the package; the payoff shows up in the share price.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BJUL profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BJUL vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BJUL vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BJUL vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BJUL 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BJUL 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BJUL $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBJULXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BJUL
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BJUL 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BJUL vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BJUL No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
BJUL None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BJUL No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BJUL No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BJUL No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BJUL No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BJULAll BJUL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

BJUL vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BJUL
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BJUL 8.3%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BJUL 1.47, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BJUL −14.1%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BJUL 0.65XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • BJULBvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJULBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BJULBvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.