BKAG ranks 6th and IMTB 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BKAG vs IMTB
BKAG −0.07pt a year
0.00%0.07%
BKAG 8.0×the volume
531K66.7K
IMTB +0.6pt
−0.2%+0.4%
BKAG vs IMTB Performance
−1.1%+1.9%
- BKAG 0.00%, better
- IMTB 0.07%
- BKAG $1.47B
- IMTB $283M
- BKAG −0.2%
- IMTB −0.1%, better
- BKAG 4.56%
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- BKAG 4062
- IMTB 3598
- BKAG 531K sh, better
- IMTB 66.7K sh
- BKAG $40.78
- IMTB $42.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKAG | IMTB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A88 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A99 |
| Risk | C47Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B65 |
| Durability | B67Higher | B66 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BKAG and IMTB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKAGA
IMTBA
In short
BKAG A core bond index fund that charges nothing. BKAG tracks the same Bloomberg US Aggregate benchmark the giants track, at a 0.00% expense ratio, and has been doing it since 2020.
IMTB Most core bond funds hand you the entire yield curve. IMTB takes only the 5-to-10-year belly, and its index reaches past the Agg into high yield, for seven basis points a year.
Stated mandate
BKAG The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg US Aggregate Total Return Index.
IMTB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade and high-yield bonds with remaining maturities between five and ten years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKAG vs IMTB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKAG vs IMTB Cost
Overpaying IMTB vs BKAG
$1,480
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKAG 0.00%
$0
IMTB 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKAG | IMTB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $0 | $128 | $128 |
| 20 | $0 | $503 | $503 |
| 30 | $0 | $1,480 | $1,480 |
- 0.00%BKAG, cheaper
- 0.07%IMTB
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
BKAG cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB 12th cheapest of 114 funds
BKAG vs IMTB Dividends
- BKAG 4.56%
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- BKAG $1.86
- IMTB $1.96
- BKAG $0.24
- IMTB $0.17
- BKAG Oct 1, 2026
- IMTB Oct 1, 2026
- BKAG Oct 6, 2026
- IMTB Oct 6, 2026
- BKAG Monthly
- IMTB Monthly
Distribution history
BKAG vs IMTB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKAG
- IMTB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKAG 5.6%, betterIMTB 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKAG 0.17IMTB 0.31, better
- Worst fall
- BKAG −17.4%IMTB −17.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- BKAG 1.00IMTB 1.05
BKAG and IMTB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.00% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.00% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
