BKDV ranks 4th and VAMO 6th of 8 funds in the US Active Contrarian Value Category.
BKDV vs VAMO
BKDV −0.05pt a year
0.60%0.65%
BKDV 36.5×the volume
491K13.5K
BKDV vs VAMO Performance
+24.4%+11.0%
- BKDV 0.60%, better
- VAMO 0.65%
- BKDV $2.29B
- VAMO $88M
- BKDV +24.4%, better
- VAMO +11.0%
- BKDV 0.52%
- VAMO 0.66%, better
- BKDV 78
- VAMO 103
- BKDV 491K sh, better
- VAMO 13.5K sh
- BKDV $34.69
- VAMO $36.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKDV | VAMO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C44Higher | D33 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | C48 |
Rank among US Active Contrarian Value funds
Same Category. BKDV and VAMO are both graded against the same 8 US Active Contrarian Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKDVB
VAMOC
In short
BKDV BNY Mellon's 2024 swing at active value: roughly 90 hand-picked US stocks, priced below what the typical active equity fund charges. A young fund with a very old asset manager behind it.
VAMO Most value funds just ride out the storm. VAMO owns roughly 100 cheap US stocks, then can short stock index futures to hedge up to 100% of that book when its model reads the market as overvalued or downtrending.
Stated mandate
BKDV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and invests principally in common stocks.
VAMO The Fund seeks income and capital appreciation through investments in the U.S. equity market. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in U.S.-listed equities deemed undervalued using valuation measures such as CAPE.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKDV vs VAMO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKDV vs VAMO Cost
Overpaying VAMO vs BKDV
$900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKDV 0.60%
$11,817
VAMO 0.65%
$12,717
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKDV | VAMO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $1,163 | $87 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $4,440 | $324 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $12,717 | $900 |
- 0.60%BKDV, cheaper
- 0.65%VAMO
- Middle half of US Active Contrarian Value funds
- Median 0.54%
BKDV 5th cheapest of 8 funds
VAMO 6th cheapest of 8 funds
BKDV vs VAMO Dividends
- BKDV 0.52%
- VAMO 0.66%, better
- BKDV $0.18
- VAMO $0.24
- BKDV $0.18
- VAMO $0.08
- BKDV Dec 29, 2025
- VAMO Sep 18, 2026
- BKDV Jan 2, 2026
- VAMO Sep 21, 2026
- BKDV Annual
- VAMO Quarterly
Distribution history
BKDV vs VAMO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKDV 11.9%VAMO 12.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKDV 0.94VAMO 0.67
- Worst fall
- BKDV −15.5%VAMO −17.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BKDV 0.73VAMO 0.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.