BKEM ranks 3rd and EEMA 5th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs EEMA
BKEM −0.38pt a year
0.11%0.49%
EEMA 6.6×the volume
15.4K101K
EEMA +0.1pt
+6.3%+6.4%
BKEM vs EEMA Performance
+35.8%+36.2%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- EEMA 0.49%
- BKEM $101M
- EEMA $784M
- BKEM +12.7%, better
- EEMA +12.0%
- BKEM 1.25%
- EEMA 1.46%, better
- BKEM 1805
- EEMA 909
- BKEM 15.4K sh
- EEMA 101K sh, better
- BKEM $28.09
- EEMA $105.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | EEMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | F23 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | C48 | A84Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and EEMA are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
EEMAB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
EEMA Emerging markets, minus the detour. EEMA owns the Asian engine room (China, Taiwan, Korea, India) and skips Latin America and EMEA entirely, spread across roughly 900 large- and mid-cap names with caps on the giants.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
EEMA The fund seeks to track an index of large- and mid-cap equities from emerging Asian countries, providing diversified exposure to Asian emerging-market equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs EEMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs EEMA Cost
Overpaying EEMA vs BKEM
$7,479
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
EEMA 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | EEMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $883 | $682 |
| 20 | $788 | $3,394 | $2,606 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $9,792 | $7,479 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.49%EEMA
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EEMA 12th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs EEMA Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- EEMA 1.46%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- EEMA $1.54
- BKEM $0.28
- EEMA $0.34
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- EEMA Jun 15, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- EEMA Jun 18, 2026
- BKEM Twice a year
- EEMA Twice a year
Distribution history
BKEM vs EEMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- EEMA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%, betterEEMA 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98EEMA 1.01, better
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%, betterEEMA −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12EEMA 1.07
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.