BKEM ranks 3rd and EEMS 11th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs EEMS
BKEM −0.61pt a year
0.11%0.72%
EEMS 3.2×the volume
15.4K49.3K
BKEM +1.2pt
+6.3%+5.1%
BKEM vs EEMS Performance
+35.8%+28.2%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- EEMS 0.72%
- BKEM $101M
- EEMS $351M
- BKEM +12.7%, better
- EEMS +3.0%
- BKEM 1.25%
- EEMS 3.11%, better
- BKEM 1805
- EEMS 1707
- BKEM 15.4K sh
- EEMS 49.3K sh, better
- BKEM $28.09
- EEMS $68.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | EEMS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F21 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | F23 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C48 | A79Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and EEMS are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
EEMSB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
EEMS Most international small-cap funds live in Japan and Europe. EEMS goes the other way: a basket of roughly 1,700 small companies from emerging markets only, in one ticker. A narrow corner of the world, priced like the specialty product it is.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
EEMS The fund seeks to track an index of small-capitalization equities from emerging-market countries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs EEMS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs EEMS Cost
Overpaying EEMS vs BKEM
$11,644
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
EEMS 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | EEMS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $1,284 | $1,083 |
| 20 | $788 | $4,888 | $4,100 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $13,957 | $11,644 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.72%EEMS
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EEMS 16th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs EEMS Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- EEMS 3.11%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- EEMS $2.14
- BKEM $0.28
- EEMS $0.48
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- EEMS Jun 15, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- EEMS Jun 18, 2026
- BKEM Twice a year
- EEMS Twice a year
Distribution history
BKEM vs EEMS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- EEMS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%EEMS 15.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98, betterEEMS 0.57
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%EEMS −27.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12EEMS 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.