XCEM ranks 2nd and EEMS 11th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
EEMS vs XCEM
XCEM −0.56pt a year
0.72%0.16%
XCEM 3.3×the volume
49.3K162K
XCEM +2.4pt
+7.4%+9.8%
EEMS vs XCEM Performance
+28.2%+61.9%
- EEMS 0.72%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- EEMS $351M
- XCEM $2.01B
- EEMS +3.0%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- EEMS 3.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- EEMS 1707
- XCEM 465
- EEMS 49.3K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- EEMS $68.81
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EEMS | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A96 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C49 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B60 |
| Durability | A79Higher | A78 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. EEMS and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EEMSB
XCEMA
In short
EEMS Most international small-cap funds live in Japan and Europe. EEMS goes the other way: a basket of roughly 1,700 small companies from emerging markets only, in one ticker. A narrow corner of the world, priced like the specialty product it is.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
EEMS The fund seeks to track an index of small-capitalization equities from emerging-market countries.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EEMS vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EEMS vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying EEMS vs XCEM
$10,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EEMS 0.72%
$13,957
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EEMS | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $292 | $992 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $1,141 | $3,747 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $3,342 | $10,615 |
- 0.72%EEMS
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
EEMS 16th cheapest of 20 funds
EEMS vs XCEM Dividends
- EEMS 3.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- EEMS $2.14
- XCEM $1.25
- EEMS $0.48
- XCEM $1.25
- EEMS Jun 15, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- EEMS Jun 18, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- EEMS Twice a year
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
EEMS vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EEMS
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EEMS 15.8%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- EEMS 0.57XCEM 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- EEMS −27.0%, betterXCEM −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EEMS 0.89XCEM 1.27
EEMS and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

