BKEM ranks 3rd and EMDM 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs EMDM
BKEM −0.64pt a year
0.11%0.75%
BKEM 1.1×the volume
15.4K13.4K
EMDM +8.2pt
+20.9%+29.1%
BKEM vs EMDM Performance
+12.7%+27.9%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- EMDM 0.75%
- BKEM $101M
- EMDM $39M
- BKEM +12.7%
- EMDM +27.9%, better
- BKEM 1.25%
- EMDM 3.11%, better
- BKEM 1805
- EMDM 104
- BKEM 15.4K sh, better
- EMDM 13.4K sh
- BKEM $28.09
- EMDM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | EMDM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F12 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B61Higher | B58 |
| Tradability | F23 | C45Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | |
| Durability | C48Higher | C42 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and EMDM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
EMDMD
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
EMDM Most emerging-market funds sort companies by size. EMDM screens countries first: only markets clearing an electoral-democracy bar are eligible, and roughly 110 large and mid caps come from the survivors.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
EMDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that Index and uses a replication strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs EMDM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs EMDM Cost
Overpaying EMDM vs BKEM
$12,169
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
EMDM 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | EMDM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $1,336 | $1,135 |
| 20 | $788 | $5,078 | $4,290 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $14,482 | $12,169 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.75%EMDM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EMDM 18th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs EMDM Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- EMDM 3.11%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- EMDM $1.16
- BKEM $0.28
- EMDM $0.18
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- EMDM Sep 24, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- EMDM Sep 30, 2026
- BKEM Twice a year
- EMDM Quarterly
Distribution history
BKEM vs EMDM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%, betterEMDM 20.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98EMDM 1.13, better
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%EMDM −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12EMDM 1.24
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.