XCEM ranks 2nd and EMDM 19th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
EMDM vs XCEM
XCEM −0.59pt a year
0.75%0.16%
XCEM 12.1×the volume
13.4K162K
EMDM +5.3pt
+29.1%+23.8%
EMDM vs XCEM Performance
+27.9%+24.3%
- EMDM 0.75%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- EMDM $39M
- XCEM $2.01B
- EMDM +27.9%, better
- XCEM +24.3%
- EMDM 3.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- EMDM 104
- XCEM 465
- EMDM 13.4K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- EMDM $37.59
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMDM | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F12 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B58Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | C45 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | B60Higher |
| Durability | C42 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. EMDM and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMDMD
XCEMA
In short
EMDM Most emerging-market funds sort companies by size. EMDM screens countries first: only markets clearing an electoral-democracy bar are eligible, and roughly 110 large and mid caps come from the survivors.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
EMDM The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in securities comprising that Index and uses a replication strategy.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMDM vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMDM vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying EMDM vs XCEM
$11,140
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMDM 0.75%
$14,482
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMDM | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $292 | $1,044 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $1,141 | $3,937 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $3,342 | $11,140 |
- 0.75%EMDM
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
EMDM 18th cheapest of 20 funds
EMDM vs XCEM Dividends
- EMDM 3.11%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- EMDM $1.16
- XCEM $1.25
- EMDM $0.18
- XCEM $1.25
- EMDM Sep 24, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- EMDM Sep 30, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- EMDM Quarterly
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
EMDM vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMDM 20.8%XCEM 20.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMDM 1.13, betterXCEM 0.95
- Worst fall
- EMDM −18.9%XCEM −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- EMDM 1.24XCEM 1.27
EMDM and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

