BKEM ranks 3rd and GSEE 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKEM vs GSEE
BKEM −0.25pt a year
0.11%0.36%
BKEM 5.2×the volume
15.4K2.93K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+6.3%+6.3%
BKEM vs GSEE Performance
+35.8%+35.4%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- GSEE 0.36%
- BKEM $101M
- GSEE $129M
- BKEM +12.7%, better
- GSEE +10.7%
- BKEM 1.25%
- GSEE 2.29%, better
- BKEM 1805
- GSEE 1799
- BKEM 15.4K sh, better
- GSEE 2.93K sh
- BKEM $28.09
- GSEE $64.35
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKEM | GSEE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B62 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61 | B61 |
| Tradability | F23Higher | F10 |
| Holdings | B68 | |
| Durability | C48 | B56Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKEM and GSEE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKEMA
GSEEB
In short
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
GSEE The emerging-markets leg of Goldman's plain-vanilla MarketBeta lineup: roughly 1,800 large and mid caps tracking a Solactive benchmark, China and all, at a fee below the category median.
Stated mandate
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
GSEE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKEM vs GSEE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKEM vs GSEE Cost
Overpaying GSEE vs BKEM
$5,007
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
GSEE 0.36%
$7,320
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKEM | GSEE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $201 | $652 | $451 |
| 20 | $788 | $2,522 | $1,734 |
| 30 | $2,313 | $7,320 | $5,007 |
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- 0.36%GSEE
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
GSEE 9th cheapest of 20 funds
BKEM vs GSEE Dividends
- BKEM 1.25%
- GSEE 2.29%, better
- BKEM $0.35
- GSEE $1.42
- BKEM $0.28
- GSEE $1.42
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- GSEE Dec 23, 2025
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- GSEE Dec 30, 2025
- BKEM Twice a year
- GSEE Annual
Distribution history
BKEM vs GSEE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKEM
- GSEE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKEM 16.2%GSEE 16.2%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BKEM 0.98, betterGSEE 0.94
- Worst fall
- BKEM −31.9%GSEE −30.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKEM 1.12GSEE 1.12Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.