Skip to content

GSEE vs XCEM

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

GSEEBCboe

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

XCEMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XCEM −0.20pt a year

GSEE0.36%XCEM0.16%

Avg volume · 30D

XCEM 55.4×the volume

GSEE2.93KXCEM162K

5Y return · a year

XCEM +3.8pt

GSEE+6.3%XCEM+10.1%

GSEE vs XCEM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+35.4%GSEE+61.9%XCEM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. GSEE +35.4%. XCEM +61.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GSEE 0.36%
XCEM 0.16%, better
Fund size
GSEE $129M
XCEM $2.01B
1Y total return
GSEE +10.7%
XCEM +24.3%, better
Yield (12M)
GSEE 2.29%
XCEM 2.68%, better
Holdings
GSEE 1799
XCEM 465
Avg volume (30D)
GSEE 2.93K sh
XCEM 162K sh, better
NAV per share
GSEE $64.35
XCEM $46.99
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GSEE: Cost 62, Risk 61, Mission 100, Tradability 10, Holdings 68, Durability 56. XCEM: Cost 90, Risk 51, Mission 100, Tradability 62, Holdings 60, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for GSEE, XCEM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGSEEXCEM
Cost30% weightB62A90Higher
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightB61HigherC51
Tradability15% weightF10B62Higher
Holdings10% weightB68HigherB60
Durability5% weightB56A78Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GSEE and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Stocks⁠

Category · 20 funds
See all 20 ›

XCEM ranks 2nd and GSEE 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.

  1. Rank 1AVEXCVanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AXCEMColumbia EM Core ex-China ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3ABKEMBNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 8BGMFState Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 9BGSEEGoldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 9BXCWisdomTree True Emerging Markets FundScore 63

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GSEEBGoldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

XCEMAColumbia EM Core ex-China ETF

In short

GSEE The emerging-markets leg of Goldman's plain-vanilla MarketBeta lineup: roughly 1,800 large and mid caps tracking a Solactive benchmark, China and all, at a fee below the category median.

XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.

Stated mandate

GSEE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index.

XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.

Why people hold it

  • GSEE Costs 0.36% net of a waiver through December 29, 2026 (0.45% gross), below the median fee among the emerging-markets funds measured in its category.gsam.com
  • Roughly 1,800 stocks. The index is built to capture about the largest 85% of emerging-market free float, so you hold the asset class rather than a curated slice of it.solactive.com
  • Passive index tracking is the whole mandate: no factor tilts, no screens, no active overlay. Measured against what the prospectus promises, it has stayed tight to the brief.
  • Keeps China in the mix, unlike ex-China rivals VEXC and XCEM that rank near the top of this category. One ticket for the full emerging-markets map.
  • XCEM Launched in 2015 as the first broad emerging markets ETF built to leave China out, and it has since grown into a billion-dollar-plus fund.morningstar.com
  • 0.16% a year, well under the typical fund in its emerging markets cohort, for a portfolio of about 150 stocks.
  • Plain mandate, closely followed: at least 80% of net assets in index companies, replicated rather than approximated, with tracking that has stayed tight.
  • One of the strongest implementations in its emerging markets peer group, and liquid enough that getting in and out is rarely the hard part.

Worth knowing

  • GSEE A small fund that trades thinly, so spreads and limit orders matter more here than with the category's household names.
  • Cheaper rivals exist: BKEM charges 0.11% for broad emerging markets, VEXC 0.07% for an ex-China build, and neither leans on a waiver.
  • That 0.36% rests on a waiver scheduled to lapse December 29, 2026; the gross expense ratio underneath it is 0.45%.
  • XCEM No China means no Tencent, no Alibaba, no A-shares. If that exposure belongs in the portfolio, it has to come from somewhere else.
  • Emerging market stocks swing hard and currency moves add to the ride. This is one of the higher-volatility corners of equity investing.
  • Cheap, not cheapest: VEXC runs the same ex-China EM idea at 0.07%. XCEM's edge is a decade of history, not the lowest fee on the shelf.

Full GSEE profile⁠

Full XCEM profile⁠

GSEE vs XCEM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GSEE vs XCEM Cost

Overpaying GSEE vs XCEM

$3,978

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GSEE 0.36%

    $7,320

  • XCEM 0.16%

    $3,342

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GSEE 0.36%
  • XCEM 0.16%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GSEE $7,320XCEM $3,342

Year by year

YearGSEEXCEMOverpaying
10$652$292$360
20$2,522$1,141$1,381
30$7,320$3,342$3,978

Expense ratio

  • 0.36%GSEE
  • 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
  • Median 0.45%

XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds

GSEE 9th cheapest of 20 funds

GSEE vs XCEM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GSEE 2.29%
XCEM 2.68%, better
Payout (12M)
GSEE $1.42
XCEM $1.25
Last payment
GSEE $1.42
XCEM $1.25
Ex-dividend
GSEE Dec 23, 2025
XCEM Dec 18, 2025
Paid on
GSEE Dec 30, 2025
XCEM Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GSEE Annual
XCEM Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GSEEAnnual · 14 paymentsAll GSEE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 14 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 24, 2020 $1.06; Dec 24, 2020 $0.26; Jun 24, 2021 $0.18; Sep 24, 2021 $1.64; Dec 27, 2021 $1.26; Mar 25, 2022 $0.72; Jun 24, 2022 $0.26; Sep 26, 2022 $0.22; Mar 27, 2023 $0.59; Jun 26, 2023 $0.22; Sep 25, 2023 $0.33; Dec 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 23, 2024 $1.21; Dec 23, 2025 $1.42. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
XCEMAnnual · 9 paymentsAll XCEM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 15, 2017 $2.37; Dec 21, 2018 $0.77; Dec 20, 2019 $0.59; Dec 18, 2020 $0.49; Dec 20, 2021 $0.62; Dec 19, 2022 $0.62; Dec 18, 2023 $0.37; Dec 18, 2024 $0.82; Dec 18, 2025 $1.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

GSEE vs XCEM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • GSEE
  • XCEM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: GSEE −30.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GSEE 16.2%, betterXCEM 20.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GSEE 0.94XCEM 0.95, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GSEE −30.9%XCEM −29.5%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GSEE 1.12XCEM 1.27

GSEE and XCEM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GSEEBvsVEXCA

    Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.36% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsVEXCA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.07%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSEEBvsBKEMA

    Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.36% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsBKEMA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.11%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GSEEBvsXSOEA

    Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF · WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.36% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XCEMAvsXSOEA

    Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF · WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.16% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.