XCEM ranks 2nd and GSEE 9th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
GSEE vs XCEM
XCEM −0.20pt a year
0.36%0.16%
XCEM 55.4×the volume
2.93K162K
XCEM +3.8pt
+6.3%+10.1%
GSEE vs XCEM Performance
+35.4%+61.9%
- GSEE 0.36%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- GSEE $129M
- XCEM $2.01B
- GSEE +10.7%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- GSEE 2.29%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- GSEE 1799
- XCEM 465
- GSEE 2.93K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- GSEE $64.35
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GSEE | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B62 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B61Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | F10 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | B68Higher | B60 |
| Durability | B56 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. GSEE and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GSEEB
XCEMA
In short
GSEE The emerging-markets leg of Goldman's plain-vanilla MarketBeta lineup: roughly 1,800 large and mid caps tracking a Solactive benchmark, China and all, at a fee below the category median.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
GSEE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GSEE vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GSEE vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying GSEE vs XCEM
$3,978
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GSEE 0.36%
$7,320
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GSEE | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $292 | $360 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $1,141 | $1,381 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $3,342 | $3,978 |
- 0.36%GSEE
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
GSEE 9th cheapest of 20 funds
GSEE vs XCEM Dividends
- GSEE 2.29%
- XCEM 2.68%, better
- GSEE $1.42
- XCEM $1.25
- GSEE $1.42
- XCEM $1.25
- GSEE Dec 23, 2025
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- GSEE Dec 30, 2025
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- GSEE Annual
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
GSEE vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GSEE
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GSEE 16.2%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GSEE 0.94XCEM 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- GSEE −30.9%XCEM −29.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GSEE 1.12XCEM 1.27
GSEE and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

