XCEM ranks 2nd and BKF 18th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
BKF vs XCEM
XCEM −0.56pt a year
0.72%0.16%
XCEM 32.7×the volume
4.95K162K
XCEM +6.4pt
+3.6%+10.0%
BKF vs XCEM Performance
−9.3%+56.5%
- BKF 0.72%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- BKF $67M
- XCEM $1.84B
- BKF −11.3%
- XCEM +24.7%, better
- BKF 1.61%
- XCEM 2.73%, better
- BKF 699
- XCEM 460
- BKF 4.95K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- BKF $39.42
- XCEM $43.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKF | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C50Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | D35 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | B60 |
| Durability | B55 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. BKF and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKFD
XCEMA
In short
BKF A survivor of the BRIC trade. Launched in 2007, BKF now packs just Brazil, India and China into one ticker: a concentrated take on three big emerging economies instead of the whole developing world.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
BKF The fund seeks to track an index composed of Brazilian, Indian, and Chinese equities and offers targeted exposure to those three major economies.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKF vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKF vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying BKF vs XCEM
$10,615
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKF 0.72%
$13,957
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKF | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $292 | $992 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $1,141 | $3,747 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $3,342 | $10,615 |
- 0.72%BKF
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
BKF 16th cheapest of 20 funds
BKF vs XCEM Dividends
- BKF 1.61%
- XCEM 2.73%, better
- BKF $0.63
- XCEM $1.25
- BKF $0.15
- XCEM $1.25
- BKF Jun 15, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- BKF Jun 18, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- BKF Twice a year
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
BKF vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BKF
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKF 13.3%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- BKF 0.21XCEM 0.95, better
- Worst fall
- BKF −39.1%XCEM −29.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BKF 0.60XCEM 1.27
BKF and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

