GII ranks 3rd and BKGI 9th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
BKGI vs GII
GII −0.15pt a year
0.55%0.40%
BKGI 10.9×the volume
453K41.6K
BKGI +2.9pt
+21.3%+18.4%
BKGI vs GII Performance
+10.7%+11.3%
- BKGI 0.55%
- GII 0.40%, better
- BKGI $1.94B
- GII $962M
- BKGI +10.7%
- GII +11.3%, better
- BKGI 3.04%, better
- GII 2.69%
- BKGI 36
- GII 89
- BKGI 453K sh, better
- GII 41.6K sh
- BKGI $42.37
- GII $74.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKGI | GII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C53 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75Higher | A72 |
| Tradability | B65 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | |
| Durability | B67 | A85Higher |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. BKGI and GII are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKGIB
GIIA
In short
BKGI Active, not indexed: Newton's team picks about 40 dividend-paying infrastructure names and counts telecom, health care and real estate as infrastructure alongside grids and pipelines. Fee: 0.55% net of a waiver through February 27, 2027.
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
Stated mandate
BKGI The fund seeks long-term total return through capital growth and income, investing primarily in dividend-paying infrastructure companies.
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKGI vs GII Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKGI vs GII Cost
Overpaying BKGI vs GII
$2,814
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKGI 0.55%
$10,904
GII 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKGI | GII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $723 | $265 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $2,793 | $997 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $8,090 | $2,814 |
- 0.55%BKGI
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
BKGI 15th cheapest of 33 funds
BKGI vs GII Dividends
- BKGI 3.04%, better
- GII 2.69%
- BKGI $1.29
- GII $2.02
- BKGI $0.29
- GII $0.78
- BKGI Oct 1, 2026
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- BKGI Oct 6, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- BKGI Quarterly
- GII Twice a year
Distribution history
BKGI vs GII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKGI 13.0%GII 12.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKGI 1.28, betterGII 1.17
- Worst fall
- BKGI −14.8%GII −20.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BKGI 0.56GII 0.56Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
BKGI and GII in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

